# In light-cone gauge, are open strings born with excitations of massless gauge boson?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
95 views

For bosonic strings, on the wordsheet there are bosonic fields $X^\mu(\tau,\sigma),\ \mu=0,1,...,D-1$. In the light-cone coordinate, we take,
$$X^+=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(X^0+X^1),\\ X^-=\frac{1}{\sqrt{2}}(X^0-X^1).$$
Within the light-cone gauge, we can fix for the string that $X^+\sim\tau$. Therefore $X^+$ plays the role of time. The non-trivial point for strings is that $X^-$ can be solved in terms of $X^+$ and $X^I$ with $I=2,...,D-1$ and turns out to be $\sigma-$independent. That means that there are no dynamical degrees of freedom for the field $X^-$. Therefore, there are only  transverse oscillations on the strings. For the mode-1 excitations of the string, we have $D-2$ independent creation operators corresponding to the transverse oscillations:
$$a^I|\text{ground state}\rangle,\ \text{for}\ I=2,...,D-1.$$
All these states carry the spacetime indices and there are $D-2$ states in total. Thus it must represent a massless gauge field. It turns out that, indeed, we can select the dimension of spacetime such that the above states are really massless.

My question is that, what is the insightful way to see that string theory was born with massless gauge states? I guess the fact that $X^-$ has no degrees of freedom comes from the reparametrization invariance. Can somebody provide an insightful explanation?

What if it turns out that, we can not set the mass for above states to be vanishing for any dimension $D$ of spacetime (this is possible, since the the dimension $D$ of spacetime must be integer which is a rather strong constraint). In string theory, we now know that, it is not the case. Is it simply a coincidence?

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.