• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,726 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  The integrated form of the anomalous nonconservation equation in two dimensions

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

I have questions in the section 19.1 of Peskin and Schroeder.

\begin{equation} \psi = \begin{pmatrix} \psi_+ \\ \psi_- \tag{19.7} \end{pmatrix} \end{equation}

The subscripts indicates the $\gamma^5$ eigenvalue.

Below we'll show that there is situtions where the axial current conservation law $$ \partial_{\mu} j^{\,\mu 5} =0 . $$ is violated, and the integrated version of $$ \partial_{\mu} j^{\,\mu 5} = \frac{e}{2\pi} \epsilon^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu} \tag{19.18} $$ holds. where the totally antisymmetric symbol $\epsilon^{\mu \nu}$ is defined as $\epsilon^{01}=+1$ on page 653.

Let us analyze this problem by thinking about fermions in one space dimension in a background $A^1$ field that is constant in space and has a very slow time dependence. We will assume that the system has a finite length $L$, with the periodic boundary conditions.

So $A^1(t,0)=A^1(t,L) $, and also $ \psi(t,0)=\psi(t,L) $.

the single-particle eigen-states of $H$ have energies \begin{alignat}{2} \psi_+ : \quad \quad & E_n && =+(k_n -eA^1), \\ \psi_+ : \quad \quad & E_n && =-(k_n -eA^1). \tag{19.36} \end{alignat}

Now we consider the slow shift of $A^1$.

If $A^1$ changes by the finite amount
$$ \Delta A^1 = \frac{2\pi}{eL} \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad \quad (19.37)$$

Where $ \Delta A^1 \gt 0 $.

the spectrum of $H$ returns to its original form. In this process, each level of $\psi_+$ moves down to the next poston, and each level of $\psi_-$ moves up to the next position, The occupation numbers of levels should be maintained in this adiabatic process. Thus, remarkably, one right-moving fermion($\psi_+$) disappears from the vacuum and one extra left-moving fermion($\psi_-$) appears.

So $$ \quad \Delta N_R=-1 ,\quad \Delta N_L=1 $$.

At the same time, \begin{alignat}{2} \int d^2x \frac{e}{2\pi} \epsilon^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu} &=&& \int dt dx \frac{e}{\pi} \partial_0 A^1 \\ &=&& \frac{e}{\pi} L(-\Delta A^1) \\ &=&& -2 \tag{19.38} \end{alignat}

where I've rectified a misprint on the LHS of the first line.

where we have inserted (19.37) in the last line. Thus the integrated form of the anomalous nonconservation equation (19.18) is indeed satisfied: $$ \Delta N_R - \Delta N_L = \int d^2x \frac{e}{2\pi} \epsilon^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu} . \tag{19.39} $$

For $ \Delta N_R - \Delta N_L =-2 $.
From $$ \int d^2x \partial_{\mu} j^{\,\mu 5} =\Delta N_R - \Delta N_L \tag{19.30} $$ we obtain $$ \int d^2x \partial_{\mu} j^{\,\mu 5} = \int d^2x \frac{e}{2\pi} \epsilon^{\mu\nu}F_{\mu\nu}. $$

Question 1:
I've checked all the calculations leading to (19.38). But I cannot understand the minus sign in the second anf the third line of (19.38).
Where does it come from?

Question 2:

In computing the changes in the separate fermion numbers, we have assumed that the vacuum cannot change the charge at large negative energies. This prescription is gauge invariant, but it leads to the nonconservation of the axial vector current.

It follws that if the vacuum changed the charge at large negative energies, this prescription would not be gauge invariant.
How come? Please would you explain?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2017-02-13 08:16 (UTC), posted by SE-user GotchaP

asked Nov 22, 2016 in Theoretical Physics by GotchaP (20 points) [ revision history ]
edited Feb 13, 2017 by Dilaton

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights