• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,075 questions , 2,226 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,749 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Intuition for why there are quantum beats in $V$-type but not in $\Lambda$-type atoms

+ 6 like - 0 dislike

When calculating the emitted intensity of an excited $\Lambda$-type or $V$-type atom with a quantized field (instead of a semiclassical approach with only quantized energy levels) one finds that there is a beat modulation on top of the emitted intensity for $V$-type but not for $\Lambda$-type atoms. The calculations are quite clear, however when it comes to the intuitive explanation of the result I'm not sure if I understand it correctly. The wikipedia page on quantum beats says

This difference is caused by quantum mechanical uncertainty. A $V$-type atom decays to state ${\displaystyle |c\rangle }$ via the emission with ${\displaystyle \omega_{a}}$ and ${\displaystyle \omega_{b}}$. Since both transitions decayed to the same state, one cannot determine along which path each decayed, similar to Young's double-slit experiment. However, ${\displaystyle \Lambda }$-type atoms decay to two different states. Therefore, in this case we can recognize the path, even if it decays via two emissions as does $V$-type. Simply, we already know the path of the emission and decay.

I heard a similar argument about the Fano resonances that arise in the photo electron spectrum of helium, when there is a resonant level (see e.g. ref. 1). In this case the intuitive explanation was the uncertainty whether the ionized electron was directly ionized by absorbing two photons or first excited to the resonant level by one photon and then ionized by another one.

Question: In the case of $V$-type atoms, what is meant by the "path" along which the atom decays and where, according to this explanation, does the interference come into play? Is it that, when observing only the final state, we cannot know which decay has happened for $V$-types?


  1. Fano resonances observed in helium nanodroplets, Laforge et.al., Phys. Rev. A 93, 050502 (2016), arXiv:1510.05473.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2016-12-17 15:04 (UTC), posted by SE-user Schlabonski

asked Jul 13, 2016 in Theoretical Physics by Schlabonski (40 points) [ revision history ]
edited Dec 17, 2016 by Dilaton

1 Answer

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

Let's clarify the problem a bit. For the V type system, suppose the system starts in state $|\psi \rangle = \alpha |a\rangle + \beta |b\rangle$. When the state $|a\rangle$ decays to $|c\rangle$, it emits a photon in mode $a$: ie., the photon mode $a$ starts in the vacuum state $|0\rangle_a$ and gets a single photon: $a_a^\dagger|0\rangle_a = |1\rangle_a$. Similarly, when state $|b\rangle$ decays to $|c\rangle$, it emits into photon mode $b$: $|0\rangle_b \to a_b^\dagger|0\rangle_b = |1\rangle_b$.

Now, let's walk through the decay: we start with system $$|\psi\rangle \otimes |0\rangle_a |0\rangle_b = (\alpha |a\rangle + \beta |b\rangle) \otimes |0\rangle_a |0\rangle_b$$ That is, the atom is in state $|\psi\rangle$, and both photon fields are vacuum. However, when the atom decays, this changes: $$ \to \alpha |c\rangle \otimes |1\rangle_a |0\rangle_b + \beta|c\rangle \otimes |0\rangle_a |1\rangle_b $$ $$ = |c\rangle \otimes \left( \alpha|1\rangle_a |0\rangle_b + \beta|0\rangle_a |1\rangle_b\right) $$ The key here is that the atom is now completely disentangled with the photon field, which has one photon in a superposition of two states (in fact we can think of this as transferring the atomic superposition state onto the photon field!)

Let's contrast this with the $\Lambda$ system. Here we start in state $$|a\rangle \otimes |0\rangle_c |0\rangle_b$$ Now the atom decays: $$ \to \gamma |c\rangle \otimes |1\rangle_c |0\rangle_b + \beta|b\rangle \otimes |0\rangle_c |1\rangle_b. $$ Here the atom is entangled with the emitted photons! Indeed, this is one variation on how people can intentionally entangle atoms with photons. But here's the catch: if you try to measure the photon field, you collapse the atomic state into either state $|c\rangle$ or $|b\rangle$, which also collapses the measured photon to be firmly in one of the two modes (either photon mode $c$ or mode $b$).

The fundamental distinction between these two systems is that in the V system, the atom is not entangled with the photon field after decay, whereas for the $\Lambda$ system the atom is entangled with the photon field.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2016-12-17 15:04 (UTC), posted by SE-user Harry Levine
answered Dec 7, 2016 by Harry Levine (20 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights