• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,726 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Literature on fractal properties of quasicrystals

+ 10 like - 0 dislike

At the seminar where the talk was about quasicrystals, I mentioned that some results on their properties remind the fractals. The person who gave the talk was not too fluent in a rigor mathematics behind those properties, and I was not able to find any clues to this area myself.

There are some papers where fractals are mentioned in application to quasicrystals, but I did not find any introductory level paper with careful mathematics. Probably there is such an introduction somewhere?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Oct 29, 2011 in Theoretical Physics by Nestoklon (340 points) [ revision history ]
retagged Mar 25, 2014 by dimension10
I remember from somewhere that quasiperiodic potentials yield fractal energy spectra

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
@Squark That's exactly what I am looking for. Not the statement itself, but some place where this fact is shown.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

2 Answers

+ 8 like - 0 dislike

Wikipedia's discussion of Penrose tiling accessibly describes two key attributes of Penrose' tiling:

  • it is aperiodic yet self-similar under scaling ("fractal")
  • it has a Fourier transform with discrete five-fold symmetry ("crystalline")

In particular, the self-similar geometry of the Penrose tiling explicitly accords with Benoit Mandelbrot's definition of fractal objects:

Mandelbrot's definition: "Fractals are irregular shapes, in either mathematics or the real world, wherein each small part is very much like a reduced-size image of the whole."

Two well-posed concrete questions then arise:

  • Does the Fourier transform of an (aperiodic) Penrose tiling show diffraction peaks similar to structures with period long-range order?
  • Starting with a single 'seed' tile and adding more tiles by strictly local matching rules, can we grow an arbitrarily large perfect Penrose tiling?

The Penrose tiling has the advantages of being simple and well posed, and moreover the preceding questions generalize naturally to real-world questions like: "By what physical process do atoms find their place in growing real-world quasi-crystals? Do local (classical) matching rules suffice to explain quasi-crystal growth at the atomic level, or are nonlocal (quantum) rules required?' Can real-world quasi-crystals grown by local classical matching rules ever be defect-free? What spatial symmetries determine the pentagonal facets that are seen on real-world quasicrystals?"

With regard to diffraction patterns, recent surveys by Peter Kramer (arXiv:1101.0061) and by Michael Baake and Uwe Grimm (arXiv:1105.0095v1) emphasize the pioneering work of Alan Mackay, whose 1982 article "Crystallography and the Penrose pattern" showed (experimentally) that Penrose tilings exhibit diffraction patterns having ten-fold symmetry; this stimulated an explosion of work that confirmed that such diffraction patterns are generic to quasicrystalline order.

Mackay's simulated diffraction pattern from a Penrose tiling

— Mackay's simulated diffraction pattern from a Penrose tiling —

With regard to quasicrystal growth, an accessible entry-point into a large literature is Uwe Grimm's and Dieter Joseph's review "Modelling Quasicrystal Growth" (arXiv:cond-mat/9903074).

A widespread opinion nowadays (one hesitates to call it a 'consensus') is that local matching rules for adding atoms, augmented by remelting processes, permit the growth of quasicrystalline structures having low (but nonzero) defect densities, sufficient to explain the observed growth of macroscopic crystals that exhibit five-fold spatial and Fourier symmetries.

millimeter-scale quasicrystal

— Ho-Mg-Zn quasicrystal (millimeter background scale) —

Contrary to early speculation, it seems that nonlocal (quantum) effects are not required to explain quasicrystal growth on macroscopic scales.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Oct 29, 2011 by John Sidles (485 points) [ no revision ]
And what about fractality?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
@Nestoklon, the answer is now amended to quote Benoit Mandelbrot's definition of fractals, in accord with which Penrose tilings are two-dimensional fractals.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Still not convinced. Mandelbrot is a nice popularizer, but there is a formal approach: one may calculate dimensionality, probably some other useful properties. Based on self-similarity of the lattice obtain self-similarity of the spectrum, whatever. That's what I am looking for. I don't know even good explanation in what sense "each small part is very much like a reduced-size image of the whole" is applicable to quasicrystals.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
@Nestoklon, I have added some references (and a picture) that illustrate how self-similarity under rescaling in Penrose tilings generates spectral peaks in diffraction patterns. Thanks for asking a great question!

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
+ 5 like - 0 dislike

Finally I asked the person working in this field and he gave me the paper http://prb.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v35/i3/p1020_1 where fractality of the spectrum is shown in rather reasonable model.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Feb 17, 2012 by Nestoklon (340 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights