Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,853 answers , 20,624 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

From gauge anomaly to chiral anomaly

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
116 views

Suppose the theory of chiral Weyl fermion (say, left) $\psi_{L}$, which interacts with abelian gauge field. This theory contains the gauge anomaly, which I write in the form
$$
\tag 1 \frac{dQ_{L}}{dt} = \text{A},
$$
where $Q_{L}$ is the left charge and $A$ is anomaly function.

The same thing is true about right fermion $\psi_{R}$. If the gauge field is vector (not axial vector), then
$$
\tag 2 \frac{dQ_{R}}{dt} = -\text{A},
$$
The underlying reason for this is that the dynamics of theory generates anomalous commutator between canonical momentums of EM field (the electric field $\mathbf E$): pcecisely,
$$
\tag 3 [E_{i}(\mathbf x), E_{j}(\mathbf y)]_{L/R} = -i\Delta^{ij}_{L/R}(\mathbf A, \mathbf y)\delta (\mathbf x - \mathbf y),
$$
where $L,R$ denotes the subspaces of left and right fermions. This gives (see the question) the anomaly $\text{A}$:
$$
\tag 4 \frac{dQ_{L/R}}{dt} = \text{A} = \int d^{3}\mathbf r E_{i}(\mathbf r)\partial_{j}\Delta^{ij}_{L/R}(\mathbf A, \mathbf r)
$$

Suppose now we take the "direct sum" of left and right representations:
$$
\psi = \psi_{L} \oplus \psi_{R}
$$
In this case, by using $(1), (2)$, we see, that there is no gauge anomaly of vector charge $Q_{\text{vector}}$,
$$
\tag 5 \frac{dQ_{\text{vector}}}{dt} = \frac{dQ_{L}}{dt} + \frac{dQ_{R}}{dt} = \text{A} - \text{A} = 0,
$$
but there is the chiral anomaly of axial charge $Q_{\text{axial}}$,
$$
\tag 6 \frac{dQ_{\text{axial}}}{dt} =\frac{dQ_{L}}{dt} - \frac{dQ_{R}}{dt} =\text{A}+\text{A}= 2\text{A}
$$
Since the vector current is the gauge current, then the total contribution into anomalous commutator from the left and right particles must vanish:
$$
\tag 7 [E_{i}(\mathbf x), E_{j}(\mathbf y)]_{L\oplus R} = -i\Delta^{ij}_{L}(\mathbf A, \mathbf y)\delta (\mathbf x - \mathbf y)-i\Delta^{ij}_{R}(\mathbf A, \mathbf y)\delta (\mathbf x - \mathbf y) = 0
$$

Although we assume the left and right particles with the same charge and mass, this looks like anomaly cancellation. The left and right fermions remain anomalous separately.

My question is following. Although the anomalous commutator $(3)$ exists on subspaces $L$ and $R$, it vanishes for their direct sum, as is shown by $(7)$. But the chiral anomaly $(6)$ exists. In terms of broken canonical commutator $(3)$ I can understand this phenomena as the fact that this commutator violates chiral symmetry. This is the direct consequence of Eqs. $(4)$, $(6)$. But to me is very strange that the gauge anomaly of left and right fermions give the ungauged anomaly for the difference of their fermion number. Is my understanding correct?

asked Oct 29, 2016 in Theoretical Physics by NAME_XXX (1,010 points) [ revision history ]
edited Oct 30, 2016 by NAME_XXX

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ys$\varnothing$csOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...