• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,728 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  $\mathcal{N} = 2^\star$ supersymmetry

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

I have read in a paper (arXiv:1507.07709v3 [hep-th]) that the $(2,0)$ superconformal field theory (SCFT) in $d = 6$ when dimensionally reduced on $S^1$ yields a $d = 5$ $\mathcal{N} = 2^\star$ theory. In an effort to learn more about this $\star$, I figured out that the theory consists of the $\mathcal{N} = 2$ gauge vector multiplet along with an adjoint hypermultiplet of mass $m$. I have a number of questions about such a construction:

Question 1: In what sense is this mass deformation of $\mathcal{N} = 4$ Super Yang-Mills (SYM) theory?

The N=4 SYM multiplet consists of an N=2 vector multiplet and an N=2 hypermultiplet, and if you make the hypermultiplet infinitely massive, it is tantamount to integrating the hypermultiplet out, yielding an N=2 SYM. In the opposite limit (of taking the mass to zero), one gets back N=4 SYM. Is this all one means by a mass deformation?

The context of my question is the so called twisted compactification of (a stack of) M5-branes on $S^1$ which leads to this five-dimensional $\mathcal{N} = 2^\star$ theory.

Question 2: In this setting, what does the mass parameter m translate to in terms of the branes? What kind of "twist" relates to the mass?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2016-08-11 19:19 (UTC), posted by SE-user leastaction

asked Aug 11, 2016 in Theoretical Physics by leastaction (425 points) [ revision history ]
edited Aug 12, 2016 by Dilaton

Could you please update the question from stackexchange? The question has been extensively edited and corrected for typos since it was first imported.

@leastaction done. Please have a look if everything is to your satisfaction.

Thank you @Dilaton!

1 Answer

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

Remark: in the question, the four dimensional terminology for supersymmetry is used whereas the theories under consideration are five dimensional. I will do the same.

The ony field of $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM is the $\mathcal{N}=4$ vector multiplet (massless). In the $\mathcal{N}=2$ language, it is the same than a $\mathcal{N}=2$ vector multiplet (massless) and a $\mathcal{N}=2$ hypermultiplet (massless) in the adjoint representation. Deforming this theory by giving a mass to the adjoint hypermultiplet gives the $\mathcal{N}=2^*$ theory.

For large mass, the adjoint hypermultiplet decouples and so one does not recover $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM (which corresponds to the limit mass going to zero) but pure $\mathcal{N}=2$ SYM consisting only of one $\mathcal{N}=2$ vector multiplet.

Compactifying the 6d theory on a circle gives $\mathcal{N}=4$ SYM. Adding a twist around the circle corresponds to giving a mass to the adjoint hypermultiplet and one obtains $\mathcal{N}=2^*$ SYM.

answered Aug 12, 2016 by 40227 (5,140 points) [ no revision ]

Thanks @40227. The question was edited and corrected for a typo (the $\mathcal{N} = 2$) shortly after it was originally posted on SE. That being said, how does compactifying on a circle yield $\mathcal{N} = 4$ SYM, and how does the twisting work? Can you suggest a reference where I can read more about this? Also, where was this $\mathcal{N} = 2^\star$ terminology first introduced?

What are the details of this twisting and where can I find them?

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights