Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,928 questions , 1,396 unanswered
4,846 answers , 20,597 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Wilson lines for Rarita-Schwinger field

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
145 views

The Rarita-Schwinger field is a field with a 1-form and a spinor index, $\psi_\mu^a$. It usually has a gauge symmetry $\delta \psi_\mu^a = \partial_\mu \eta^a$ parametrized by an arbitrary spinor $\eta^a$. I want to understand this field more like a gauge field. Does it have holonomy? Can I compute Wilson loops? Surface operators?

asked Apr 9, 2016 in Theoretical Physics by Ryan Thorngren (1,605 points) [ no revision ]
Is $\psi_\mu^a$ a connection in your Lagrangian?

@Jia Yes I should have called it $A^a_\mu$ or something (: It begins life as a tensor of a 1-form and a spinor, but then it has this gauge transformation that makes it only locally such a thing. It's like a spinor whose components are connections.

In that case I would imagine yes, since all the items you mentioned quite naturally arise from connections. But I have no clue about the specifics, I wonder if there's "lattice supergravity" study on this.

I don't understand the situation well, but here are some comments. It would have to be a massless spin 3/2 field to behave as a kind of gauge field - in this case all but two of the components are suppressed by gauge invariance. See, e.g., http://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.18.3630

Maybe first looking at the gauge description of a massless spin-1/2 field, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0370269380907406 gives insight into how the fermionic part behaves....

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$y$\varnothing$icsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...