• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,075 questions , 2,226 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,749 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Compactifying on a circle and the exchange of R and NS sectors

+ 8 like - 0 dislike

I've noticed a general phenomenon in compactifying on a circle where if you start with, say, an NS field, then the KK fields with an index along the circle will be in the R sector, and those without will of course remain in the NS sector.

I am wondering how to understand this phenomenon. What is the story for fermions? Their behavior under compactification is quite different, with the spinor bundle tending to split as a tensor product rather than as a direct sum.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2016-03-03 18:47 (UTC), posted by SE-user Ryan Thorngren

asked Mar 20, 2013 in Theoretical Physics by Ryan Thorngren (1,925 points) [ revision history ]
edited Mar 3, 2016 by Dilaton
It's a good sketch for a question. However, it's a bit confusing. Are you talking about the (anti)periodicity on the spacetime circle (then you shouldn't call it R/NS) or the periodicity along a closed string i.e. world sheet? In the latter case, I may imagine that you're asking why the antiperiodic NS sector is given by simpler operators than the R sector which contains spin fields with spinor indices. Is that what you're asking? Or are you asking about some orbifolds that correlate NS/R with the momentum along the spacetime circle?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2016-03-03 18:47 (UTC), posted by SE-user Luboš Motl

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights