• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  How to construct effective interaction vertex?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

In literatures, I often come across interactions like the $D^*D\gamma$ vertex:
$$\mathcal{L}_{D^*D\gamma}(x)=\frac{e}{4} \epsilon^{\mu \nu \alpha \beta} F_{\mu \nu}(x)\left({g_1} D^{*-}_{\alpha \beta}(x)D^+(x)+g_2 \bar{D}^{*0}_{\alpha\beta}(x)D^0{x}\right)+h.c.$$
where $D^{(*)}$ stands for $D^{(*)} $meson.

I can only check that each term respect parity, however why the relative sign between $g_1$ and $g_2$ are positive? Is it just a convention?

The above formula is about pseudo-scalar vector (massless) vector or $PVV$interaction.
As to construct $VVV, VPV$ or other fancy interactions, I have no idea.  
I've searched on the web and the textbook, but they are not focused on this.

So how to construct interactions like this from scratch?

I'll be very appreciated if someone could tell me any books or references on this topic.

asked Feb 29, 2016 in Theoretical Physics by forthebest (25 points) [ no revision ]

Normally the idea of "matching" in EFT is to write down all possible interactions that respect the symmetry, organized by operator dimensions. Then calculate the scattering amplitudes as a function of coupling constants, then match them with experiments or the UV theory results, then you can determine the values of the coupling constants.

@JiaYiyang Yes, I know the general constrains of the symmetry. However, I can't be 100 percent sure about the terms I wrote down, so I really want a textbook or papers who has a through treatment on this topic. For example, the interaction of massive $V$ in $VVP$ vertex will be different from a massless vector particle; gauge symmetry will play a important role.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights