• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Conventions on Downvoting

+ 13 like - 0 dislike

I'd like to link to conventions on downvoting in CSTheory, which Kaveh distilled from a town hall meeting, and which I largely agree with. I'm not saying the conventions here need to be the same, but I think this is a discussion and a decision that should happen sooner as opposed to later.

I am motivated to post this because I recently asked a question that has several upvotes and at least two downvotes. The downvoters did not give any reason for downvoting, and I have no idea whether there was some technical issue with my presentation, or if they thought the question was off-topic for the site, or some other reason.

Also, I think downvoting without commenting in private beta makes no sense. To set the stage for the public unveiling of the site, shouldn't people asking questions receive as much direction as possible about what is and is not appropriate?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Sep 15, 2011 in SE.TP.discussion by Aaron Sterling (130 points) [ no revision ]
I'd just add that on meta things are different: your vote is taken to reflect your opinion on something (i.e. layout, policies, etc.), and so the same explanation is often not warranted.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
"I think downvoting without commenting in private beta makes no sense" - Completely agree!

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights