# Literature question: Generalized Dirac equation

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
256 views

For the Dirac equation, $i\gamma^\mu\partial_\mu\psi-m\psi=0$, $\overline{\psi}\gamma^\mu\psi$ is a conserved current. I feel like I've known this since I was three. $\overline{\psi}\gamma^\mu\psi$ is also a conserved constant, however, for the related parameterized set of equations,

$$i\gamma^\mu(1+i\alpha_1\gamma^5)\partial_\mu\psi-m(\alpha_3+i\alpha_2\gamma^5)\psi=0,$$

provided $\alpha_1$, $\alpha_2$, and $\alpha_3$ are real constants. A further constraint in QFT is that the matrix

$$M=k_\alpha\gamma^\alpha\left[k_\mu\gamma^\mu(1+i\alpha_1\gamma^5)-m(\alpha_3+i\alpha_2\gamma^5)\right],\quad \mbox{where } k_\mu k^\mu=m^2,$$

must be positive semi-definite for the two-point VEVs to be positive semi-definite, as they must be for us to construct a free field Fock-Hilbert space, which is satisfied only if $\alpha_1^2+\alpha_2^2+\alpha_3^2\le 1$. Given that, we have a class of free quantum fields. If $\alpha_1^2+\alpha_2^2+\alpha_3^2=1$, $M$ has a 2-dimensional zero eigenspace, as for the usual Dirac equation, $\alpha_3=1,\alpha_2=\alpha_1=0$, or in it's conjugate form, $\alpha_3=-1,\alpha_2=\alpha_1=0$, so achieving the bound is perhaps preferred so as not to introduce too many DoFs.

Is this generalized Dirac equation discussed in the literature? It seems possible that electrons, muons, and tauons might satisfy this equation with different values of $\alpha_1$, $\alpha_2$, and $\alpha_3$, but yet with the same conserved current, and that this difference might make a difference, or at least that someone must have shown that this either isn't useful or is equivalent to the usual Dirac equation. We also might investigate symmetries that transform between different values of $\alpha_1$, $\alpha_2$, and $\alpha_3$, etc., etc.

References preferred, or else an explanation of why it's obvious why this isn't useful. Thanks.

$$(1+i\alpha_1\gamma^5)-\frac{k_\mu\gamma^\mu}{m}(\alpha_3+i\alpha_2\gamma^5),$$
generated by $\gamma^5C$, $\frac{k_\mu\gamma^\mu}{m}C$, and $\frac{k_\mu\gamma^\mu\gamma^5}{m}$, where $C$ is a charge conjugation operator that commutes with $\gamma^\mu$, with $C^2=1$ and $CiC=-i$. That expressing this symmetry requires the introduction of $C$ suggests why this generalized Dirac equation is not mentioned as a possibility, but in any case $\overline{\psi}\gamma^\mu\psi$ is conserved; $C$ only has to be invoked to transform between the different cases. The specialness of $C$ could be a spontaneous breaking of the symmetry.
 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.