Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,853 answers , 20,624 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

What is the effective (quantum) lagrangian of a fermion field for fixed electromagnetic field?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
165 views

Prolog

Let $\mathcal L=\frac{1}{2}(\partial\phi^2+m^2\phi^2)+\frac{g}{3!}\phi^3$ be the lagrangian for $\phi^3$ theory (real-scalar field $\phi)$

The action of the theory is
$$
S=\frac{1}{2}\int \frac{\mathrm dk}{(2\pi)^4}\bigg[\phi(-k)(k^2+m^2)\phi(k)\bigg]+\\ +\frac{g}{3!}\int\frac{\mathrm dk_1}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{\mathrm dk_2}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{\mathrm dk_3}{(2\pi)^4} \phi(k_1)\phi(k_2)\phi(k_3)(2\pi)^4\delta(k_1+k_2+k_3)
$$

The amplitude for any process can be calculated, order by order in $g$, by summing all the tree and loop diagrams, using the interaction as vertices.

On the other hand, we can define the (quantum) effective action for the theory,
$$
\Gamma=\frac{1}{2}\int\frac{\mathrm dk}{(2\pi)^4}\bigg[\phi(k)(k^2+m^2-\Pi(k^2)\bigg]\phi(k)+\\+\sum_{n=3}^\infty \frac{1}{n!}\int\frac{\mathrm dk_1}{(2\pi)^4}\cdots\frac{\mathrm dk_n}{(2\pi)^4} V_n(k_1,\cdots,k_n)\phi(k_1)\cdots \phi(k_n) (2\pi)^4\delta(k_1+\cdots+k_n)
$$
where $V_n$ is the $n$-point vertex function (i.e., amplitude for a process with $n$ external lines that are one/two/three particle-irreducible, using the exact propagator for the lines, and the exact three-point vertex function for the interactions).

The point of the effective quantum action is that the tree-level amplitudes of $\Gamma$ are equivalent to the tree+loop amplitudes of $S$. 


My question(s)

I'm trying to find a reference of how to calculate the quantum effective action for fermions, for fixed external electromagnetic field (in QED). In other words, I'm trying to do the same as for the scalar field $\phi$, but using a fermion field $\psi$, whose interactions are mediated by a fixed electromagnetic field $A^\mu$.

I haven't been able to find a reference for what I'm trying to do, but I my guess is that the effective action can be written as
$$
\Gamma\overset{?}{=}\int \frac{\mathrm dk}{(2\pi)^4}\bar\psi(-k)\bigg[\not k+m-\Sigma(\not k)\bigg]\psi+\int\frac{\mathrm dk_1}{(2\pi)^4}\frac{\mathrm dk_2}{(2\pi)^4} \bar\psi(k_1)V_2(k_1,k_2)\psi(k_2)+\cdots
$$

where $V_2=V_2(A^\mu,A^\mu_{,\nu})$, and $\cdots$ includes higher powers of $\psi$ (and derivative interactions?).

My ansatz for first correction to the action is
$$
V_2(k_1,k_2)= \bigg[A^\mu\mathcal M_\mu+\partial_{[\mu} A_{\nu]}\, \mathcal M^{\mu\nu}+\text{higher powers of $A$}\bigg]
$$
where ($k_3=k_2-k_1$)

though I'm not quite sure what $\mathcal M^{\mu\nu}$ should be.

  1. Question 1) Is there any nice reference for what I'm trying to calculate?
  2. Question 2) Is my guess for $\Gamma$ right? if so,
  3. Question 2) Is my guess for $V_2$ right? if so,
  4. Question 4) Should the external lines $k_1,k_2,k_3$ be taken on-shell, or of-shell?
asked Jan 1, 2016 in Theoretical Physics by AFT [ no revision ]
recategorized Jan 9, 2016

Since $A$ is an external background, it can't appear as internal lines, so there can't be connected diagrams with more than two fermion external lines, and this means the effective potential should be only quadratic. 

... so that means that my guess for $\Gamma$ is right, and what I wrote as $\cdots$ is actually $\cdots=0$ (no higher corrections)?

Yes. And this shouldn't be surprising, fermions with an external background field is almost a non-interacting theory. Fermions can only interact with the background field but not among themselves. 

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysic$\varnothing$Overflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...