Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

(propose a free ad)

Why does the free hermitian scalar field Lagrangian need a factor of 1/2 even though the equation of motion is invariant if the Lagrangian is multiplied by any number, as in: \[L=\alpha \frac12(\partial_\mu\phi\partial^\mu\phi-m^2\phi^2)\]

This is for convenience as otherwise a factor of 2 would appear in the Euler-lagrange equations, though this doesn't change the final field equations. The factor can be changed to any positive number by rescaling the field; hence there is no loss of generality assuming it to be $1/2$.

Note also that the scale matters in the quantum case, as the path integral depends on $e^{i S/\hbar}$, where the action $S$ is obtained by integrating the Lagrangian density.

I wasn't sure whether the factor of half had significance. Does such a scale, which shows up in the action, have any non-trivial consequences in QFT?

@conservedcharge: As Arnold has explained, yes, it matters because we normalize fields for them to have some physical meaning and the normalization conditions are not contained in the field equations. When you calculate the transition probability amplitude, say from a free quantum motion to the same free quantum motion, you have to have this $1/2$ in $S$ in order to obtain unity.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required