• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,720 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  ADM decomposition for Gauss-Bonnet like gravity

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Suppose we have a Gauss-Bonnet like theory which its Lagrangian can be written as, 
\[\mathcal{L}=aR^2+bR_{\mu\nu}R^{\mu\nu}+cR_{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma} R^{\mu\nu\lambda\sigma}\]
I want to write above after the ADM decomposition. I know that Riemann tensor can be written in term of the ADM variable via Gauss, Codazzi and Ricci equations. Namely via Eq 2.11 in this paper. Essentially what I am looking after is to write the above Lagrangian as 4.25 in the same paper. So far I tried to use the definitions of the terms appearing in 4.25 but I was not so successful. (The definitions are given in 2.13). Any one has any idea about this? 

asked Dec 20, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by William [ no revision ]
recategorized Dec 21, 2015 by dimension10

Nice paper. I do not understand what is the problem, the Lagrangian in the paper is identical up to coefficients and all the relations for the computation are just handed over. Of course, to get the same results, you must use the same constraint/divergence-addition procedure ($(2.1)\to (2.18) \to (3.2)$, also maybe read Faddeev & Jackiw to gain insight on the de-constrainization).

Thanks Void. Yes I know the procedure but I can not get exactly as it is in 4.25. That is why I asked for some deeper expertise. However thanks for the paper. 

@Wiliam The relations in $(4.25)$ are of course easily obtained by considering the definitions in $(2.13)$ and $h^{\mu \nu} \equiv g^{\mu \nu} + n^\mu n^\nu$.

@Void, Thanks, I think however the relation you have use shall be corrected to \(h^{\mu\nu}=g^{\mu\nu}-n^\mu n ^\nu\)

@Wiliam In $-+++$ signature (which is used in the paper) you can check explicitly that the sign is correct, e.g. by consulting $(2.8),\,(2.9)$.

Oh yes sure, you're right. 

1 Answer

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

Use \[h^{\mu\nu}=g^{\mu\nu}+n^\mu n^\nu\]

answered Dec 21, 2015 by Bernard [ revision history ]
edited Dec 21, 2015

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights