# What is known about Higgs LHC machine learning algorithm for identifying Higgs events?

+ 6 like - 0 dislike
513 views

Recently many LHC-affiliated organizations and otherwise announced the Higgs ML learning challenge (in May) running over the summer. There are many competing teams and significant results posted already.

Is this contest duplicating analysis that has been done inside LHC teams already, looking for better Higgs-related statistical classification than "in-house" algorithms? If so, what is known about the nature/performance of "in-house" algorithms? Is any of that published? Especially wondering how it compares with the same contest metric.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-10-23 17:26 (UTC), posted by SE-user vzn
asked Jun 21, 2014
retagged Oct 23, 2015
Pointedly there isn't a "the LHC algorithm". Each experiment runs it's own analysis and will have their own algorithm (or more likely algorithms). The field shares the basic skillset for writing and running these things, but the state of the art is always pressing forward and a better Higgstrap can mean being first to publish some important new measurement, so the details come out after the experiment has milked some value our of each improvement (this is also how you show that it was an improvement...).

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-10-23 17:26 (UTC), posted by SE-user dmckee
understood ofc there are many algorithms/experiments. however the competition is for a very specific scenario of something like Higgs decay into two taus. has that analysis been published by insiders (LHC teams)? is that different than detection of the Higgs? what algorithm did they use there? etc

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-10-23 17:26 (UTC), posted by SE-user vzn
I'm not a collider guy and have moved on from the job I had recently where I worked next to a couple and saw a bunch of their talks, so I'm not up on the details of what has been released. I'm a little out of my depth on anything at those energies, but I would expect that mode to be a bit tricky because there is a lot of variability in the missing $p_T$ and many ways the $\tau$s can manifest in the detector.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-10-23 17:26 (UTC), posted by SE-user dmckee

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\varnothing$ysicsOverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.