• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,054 questions , 2,207 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,721 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Seiberg-Witten theory and its physical interpretation

+ 2 like - 0 dislike

I have been working on Seiberg-Witten theory (well, I am now familiar with its computation), but i do not now the physical concept of this theory.

For example, i now from the duality of electro-magnetic field, the variable $(\begin{array}& a \\ a_D \end{array})$ and its relation comes out.

As far as I know, these variables are parameters of low effective action for $N=2$ IR action, $i.e$ parameters of pre-potential. $F$

And from the duality relation of $a$ and $a_D$ ($F$ and $F_D$) there are some relation like \begin{align} &\tau= \frac{\partial^2 F}{\partial a^2}, \quad \tau_D = \frac{\partial^2 F_D}{\partial a_D^2} \\ & a_D = \frac{\partial F}{\partial a}, \quad a = - \frac{\partial F_D}{\partial a_D} \end{align} and eventually obtain \begin{align} \tau_D = -\frac{1}{\tau} \end{align} which seemingly interested with dual gauge coupling and original coupling is kind of relation as strong-weak duality.

Take further, using the seiberg witten curve $\lambda$ \begin{align} a= \oint_{\gamma_1} \lambda, \quad a_D = \oint_{\gamma_2} \lambda \end{align} From this the mass spectrum of BPS particle \begin{align} M = n a + m a_D \end{align} which seemingly related with in $M$ theory picture's of n M2 brane and m M5 branes.

Can anyone make some comment of physical interpretation of $a, a_D, \tau, \tau_D$ or general comments of physical meaning of seiberg-witten theory? Any comment related with seiberg-witten theory is welcome!

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-09-06 15:08 (UTC), posted by SE-user phy_math

asked Aug 29, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by phy_math (185 points) [ revision history ]
edited Sep 6, 2015 by Dilaton
@ACuriousMind, I mean its physical interpretation or physical application. $i.e$ role of brane picture, relation to topological string theory and so on.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-09-06 15:08 (UTC), posted by SE-user phy_math

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights