# Axioms for Euclidean Green's functions's paper 3

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
341 views

Again the same paper:

https://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1103858969

On page 104, they argue that Eq. (6.4) follows immediately from (6.3) on page 103 and (E1) on page 102, with $V$ replaced by $\bar{U}$, because $\Lambda(U,\bar{U})$ leaves the zero component invariant.

Here are the equations:

$$(E1)\sigma_{\nu k}(x_1,\ldots , x_n) = \sum_\mu S_k(U^{-1},V^{-1})^\mu_\nu \sigma_{\mu k}(Rx_1+a,\ldots, Rx_n+a)$$

$$(6.3)S_{\nu k}(\xi_1,\ldots , \xi_n)=\int e^{-\sum_{k=1}^n (\xi_k^0 q_k^0 - i \xi_k q_k)}\tilde{W}(q_1,\ldots, q_n)d^{4n}q$$

I don't see how this is immediate, can someone clear this matter to me?

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.