• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

149 submissions , 124 unreviewed
4,020 questions , 1,442 unanswered
4,938 answers , 21,010 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
540 active unimported users
More ...

  Five Frequently Fatal Freshman Physics Fantasies

+ 0 - 2
+ 0 - 2
Referee this paper: arXiv:physics/0605152 by Michael Courtney, Norm Althausen, (show more)

Please use comments to point to previous work in this direction, and reviews to referee the accuracy of the paper. Feel free to edit this submission to summarise the paper (just click on edit, your summary will then appear under the horizontal line)

(Is this your paper?)

Closed as per community consensus as the post is not about physics.
submission not yet summarized

paper authored May 17, 2006 to Closed Questions by  (no author on PO assigned yet) 
  • [ no revision ]
    recategorized Jul 5, 2015 by Dilaton

    Are physics.ed-ph papers really on-topic? I don't think it shuld be. And how would the accuracy be voted on?

    @Dimension10 whereas some educational papers concerning graduate level physic might be on topic, the popular level rather sociological text based paper in this submission has absolutely nothing to do with graduate-level+ physics.

    Voting to close.

    Also, the text is so short that the little information it contains can not be accurate, and the claims are not original either.

    user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

    Your rights