Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,847 answers , 20,601 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Plane wave conditions

+ 0 like - 1 dislike
63 views

Which conditions have to be fulfilled in order to approximate a light beam by a plane
wave (i.e. $\phi(x)\approx \phi(0)e^{ikx}$)?

I am looking for both mathematical and experimental conditions. At the moment, the only thing I can think of is to consider that the source is at a very distant point and the use of collimators.

Closed as per community consensus as the post is high-school/UG level.
asked May 27, 2015 in Closed Questions by wieblinger (-5 points) [ no revision ]
recategorized May 27, 2015 by dimension10

Is this question maybe more appropriate for physics stackexchange?

I agree with @JoshBurby.

Voting to close as high-school/UG level. PO is for graduate-level+ questions.

A spherical wave has an exact expression (with $1/r$ factor). Within certain precision $\varepsilon$ the denominator can be considered constant. Thus, the plane wave approximation has the corresponding limits in the volume.

1 Answer

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

For the intuition's sake, perhaps it would be useful to visualize the ripples produced by throwing a stone into a pond. Close to where the stone impacted the pond's surface, the wave fronts are strongly curved, and are not approximated well by a plane wave. However, at large distances from the point of impact the curvature of the wavefronts is very small, and a plane wave approximation is more accurate.

Because the wave equation for electromagnetic waves in free space is essentially identical to that governing the surface waves on a pond, the above picture generalizes to give a picture of light waves produced by, say, an oscillating dipole. When you are sufficiently far from the dipole, the radiation field will be approximately plane.

answered May 27, 2015 by Josh Burby (120 points) [ no revision ]




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...