# How does non-linear behaviour arise from the inherently linear QM framework?

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
501 views

Quantum mechanics is a linear theory, living in a Hilbert space with built-in linearity. It has even been argued that introducing non-linearity in the quantum theory would allow for superluminal signalling.

As far as I know there is also no experimental evidence showing that QM breaks down at a certain scale.

So why is it then that the world exhibits rich non-linear behaviour? Where does the non-linearity arise from mathematically?

EDIT: On examples of nonlinear behaviour:

• Properties of materials (electrical resistance, elasticity)
• Chaotic dynamics
• Complex systems
This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-05-13 18:58 (UTC), posted by SE-user miha priimek
we can't know what examples of non-linearity you have in mind. Can you give some examples?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-05-13 18:58 (UTC), posted by SE-user Sofia
There are at least two points where it can enter: (1) A linear PDE can have a close relation to a non-linear ODE. Classical Hamilton-Jacobi theory allows you to formulate classical mechanics in the form of a linear PDE. (2) If you describe a subsystem by a density matrix, the evolution equation for the density matrix can have non-linear terms modeling the interaction of the subsystem with the environment. (I don't want to prevent anybody from writing a proper answer by this comment, even if it should use the same examples. I'm just too lazy to write a detailed answer.)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-05-13 18:58 (UTC), posted by SE-user Thomas Klimpel
as for the break-down of QM, see this answer physics.stackexchange.com/questions/159922/…. The scale where such break-down is expected to occur is given by Planck's length.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-05-13 18:58 (UTC), posted by SE-user Phoenix87

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

Non-linearity arises when one takes the limit of quantum dynamics in some sense. Two standard examples are:

1) the semiclassical approximation (i.e. Born's correspondence principle) where in the limit of large quantum numbers ("$\hslash\to 0$") quantum linear dynamics becomes the classical (usually non-linear) one;

2) Mean field approximation (i.e. the limit of a very large number of particles), where the dynamics of each component of the system is modelled by an effective non-linear dynamics (i.e. Hartree or Gross-Pitaevskii equations as the mean field limit of many-bosons systems in condensed matter).

The subject of analyzing rigorously this classical or mean field limit is a very active subject in the domain of mathematical physics/analysis of PDEs.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2015-05-13 18:58 (UTC), posted by SE-user yuggib
answered Jan 18, 2015 by (360 points)

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysic$\varnothing$OverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.