Review papers are on-topic in the reviews section, but the originality score marker is not appropriate for most of them.
Unfortunately, there seem to be a few review papers with originality votes, such as Fuchs (1997) and Callaway (1988).
It's better not go around cutting originality scores for all review papers, though, because a few do have (at least a little) original content in them, such as Nakayama (2013).
Please propose similiar submissions in the answers to remove originality votes. Instead of having a threshold score, we could give a 7-day period for anyone to point out any original content in the post (the originality voters will also be asked to explain). If there is nothing, votes are cut.