Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,082 questions , 2,232 unanswered
5,353 answers , 22,786 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
820 active unimported users
More ...

  Evidence for the direct decay of the 125 GeV Higgs boson to fermions

Originality
+ 2 - 0
Accuracy
+ 3 - 0
Score
6.27
1324 views
Referee this paper: arXiv:1401.6527 by CMS Collaboration

Please use comments to point to previous work in this direction, and reviews to referee the accuracy of the paper. Feel free to edit this submission to summarise the paper (just click on edit, your summary will then appear under the horizontal line)

(Is this your paper?)


submission not yet summarized

paper authored Jan 24, 2014 to hep-ex by  (no author on PO assigned yet) 
  • [ no revision ]

    1 Review

    + 1 like - 0 dislike

    It is a part of the intensive investigations made to confirm that the new discovered boson around 125 GeV, which was observed coupling to bosons, is really the Brout-Engels-Higgs boson of the Standard Model.

    This very technical short report focuses of the study of the theoretical decay BEH boson -> bottom quarks and T leptons particle/antiparticle pairs. To hide the QCD direct production of bottom/anti quark pairs noise, only decays associated to a W or a Z boson production are selected. Results are consistent with the Standard Model prediction of a Yukawa structure, where coupling are proportional to the fermions masses. Assuming that the BEH mechanism is produced as expected in the SM, this leads to the conclusion that the 125 GeV BEH boson, previously indentified to couple to bosons, couples also to down-type fermions. This internal consistency of the standard model does not invalidate all the fermions mass origin alternative theories, but gives strong indications on the pertinency of the new boson existence and unicity.

    The student in experimental physics can find here inspiration for a lot of numerical and technical exercises, fe on the data discrimination and the significance notion and evaluation. Supplemental data are available in other publications. It is also a model of rigor for any experiment that he will have to carry out later.

    reviewed Jul 21, 2018 by igael (360 points) [ no revision ]

    Isn't "This internal consistency of the standard model..." due to many fitting parameters of SM?

    @VladimirKalitvianski: general consistency of the SM is out of topic :) I was meaning internal consistency of the BEH mechanism in the SM. The new boson seems certainly to be the SM BEH boson. While it is a minimalist conclusion, they found the predicted decay associated with W and Z, and the resulting related BEH boson energy is in the same bounds than the one found to couple with bosons.

    Your Review:

    Please use reviews only to (at least partly) review submissions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
    To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
    Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
    This is the review box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
    Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
    Your name to display (optional):
    Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
    Anti-spam verification:
    If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
    p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflow
    Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
    Please complete the anti-spam verification




    user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

    Your rights
    ...