• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,037 questions , 2,191 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,706 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  monodromy defects and Chern-Simons

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

In the context of string theory I recently read "The formulation of Chern-Simons theory in terms of monodromy defects can be carried through all the dualities of the present paper, leading to descriptions based on codimension two defects in various dimensions, as we explain briefly in section 6. This matter certainly merits much closer attention."

Can somebody explain what monodromy defects are?

[Edit: The quoted sentence appears in the introduction of this arxiv preprint of Ed Witten. --PLC]

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-04-04 12:37 (UTC), posted by SE-user Paul
asked Feb 3, 2011 in Mathematics by Paul (85 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Apr 4, 2015
Please include a full citation (with link to PDF, if available) for the quote. Also, please provide some indication of what you do and don't already know --- your question currently is rather vague, and seems to ask for someone to write a long expository article just for you, but you could focus your question with a bit of background.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-04-04 12:37 (UTC), posted by SE-user Theo Johnson-Freyd

1 Answer

+ 7 like - 0 dislike

In Quantum Field Theory and the Jones Polynomial, Witten showed how to get the Jones polyomial as a Wilson Loop in Chern-Simons theory. The Chern-Simons Lagrangian is $$ \mathcal{L} = \frac{k}{4\pi} \int_M \mathrm{Tr}(A \wedge dA + \frac{2}{3} A \wedge A \wedge A )$$ Here you're integrating over a 3-manifold (e.g. $M= S^3)$, but you're also integrating over the moduli space of connections $A$ on $M$, so $A$ takes values in some lie algebra, e.g. $\mathfrak{g} = \mathfrak{su}(2)$.

Based on this information they can calculate the partition function for $M = S^3, \mathfrak{g}=\mathfrak{su}(2)$ to be $$ Z(S^3) = \sqrt{\frac{2}{k+2}}\sin \frac{\pi}{k+2} $$

In this theory, one can also define ``Wilson loops" over closed curves in your 3-manifold, i.e. knots. $$ W_R(C) = \mathrm{Tr}_R\left[ P \exp \int_C A \cdot dx \right]$$ Remember if we exponentiate an element of the Lie algebra $A \in \mathfrak{g}$ then $e^A$ is going to be an element of the Lie group $G$. So $e^{\int_C A dx} \in G$. Proving the Wilson loops give you Jones polynomials involves the Atiyah-Singer index theorem and some surgery theory of manifolds. Wilson loops can be used to derive Khovanov Homology.

Lately, in the physics literature, there is a tendency to derive things from 6-dimensional gauge theory and "dimensionally" reduce down to lower dimensions. Unfortunately I am in a hurry, and I refer you to Section 6, pp 120-123 for the definition of "monodromy defect" which I can fill in later

In gauge theory with gauge group G on any manifold X, let U be a submanifold of codimension 2. Let C be a conjugacy class in G. Then one considers gauge theory on X\U with the condition that the gauge fields have a monodromy around U that is in the conjugacy class C. A surface operator supported on U is defined by asking in addition that the fields should have the mildest type of singularity consistent with this monodromy or (depending on the context) by imposing additional conditions on the singular behavior along U. We will call codimension two operators of this sort monodromy defects.

So in gauge theory, there are line operators and sometimes surface operators. Since Chern-Simons theory is 3-dimensional, co-dimension 2 is 3-2 = 1-dimensional. Witten wants to re-derive some properties of knots using these operators instead.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-04-04 12:37 (UTC), posted by SE-user john mangual
answered May 25, 2012 by john mangual (310 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights