# Spinor space to Euc. vector space: does there exist a universal bilinear map?

+ 6 like - 0 dislike
489 views

Let $S$ be a spin representation of the Euclidean spin group $Spin(d)$ and let ${\mathbb R}^d$ be Euclidean $d$-space with $Spin(d)$ action on it in the canonical way, via the 2:1 cover to $SO(d)$. (I am being careful here: A spin rep.'', notthe spin rep.'')

Is there, for all $d$, an onto quadratic $Spin(d)$-equivariant map $S \to {\mathbb R}^d$? If so, is there a universal' ($d$-independent) construction of this map?

MOTIVATION: For $d=2, 3$ I know these maps. They are famous in celestial mechanics and yield the
standard regularizations of the Kepler problem, or, what is the same, of binary collisions in the classical N-body problem. They turn Kepler for negative energies into a harmonic oscillator.

Case $d=2$. I take $Spin(2)$ to also be $S^1$, but wrapped twice' around $S^1 = SO(2)$. $S = {\mathbb C}$. The quadratic map is $w \to w^2$. This is the Levi-Civita regularization.

Case $d= 3$. This is the standard Hopf map ${\mathbb C}^2 \to {\mathbb R}^3$, or if you prefer, from the quaternions ${\mathbb H }$ to ${\mathbb R}^3$, sending $q$ to $q k \bar q$. The astronomers call this Kuustanheimo-Steifel regularization.

WHERE I'VE LOOKED SO FAR: I tried to make sense out of Deligne's discussion on spinors in the AMS two-volume set from some Princeton year on string theory from a decade or so ago. I understand that over the complexes, there is either exactly one or exactly two spin representations, depending on the parity of $d$. So even there , we don't get a universal' d-dependent map. Over the reals things decompose in a rather complicated dimension dependent way (mod 8 probably) and there is no clear choice. I also looked in Reese Harvey's book which I find too baroque and signature depend to penetrate.

Case $d=4$. Here I am not sure. But I know $Spin(4) = SU(2) \times SU(2)$ which I can think of as two copies of the unit quaternions, each acting on `its own'' ${\mathbb H}$. I guess in this case I better take $S = {\mathbb H} \times {\mathbb H}$ Then I get the desired quadratic map ${\mathbb H} \times {\mathbb H} \to {\mathbb H} = {\mathbb R}^4$ as $(q_1, q_2) \mapsto q_1 \bar q_2$.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-20 16:59 (UTC), posted by SE-user Richard Montgomery
retagged Feb 20, 2015

+ 6 like - 0 dislike

For $Spin(5)\simeq USp(4)$, the spin representation of $Spin(5)$ is the defining representation $\mathbf{4}$ of $USp(4)$. The tensor product $\mathbf{4}\otimes \mathbf{4}$ decomposes as $$\mathbf{1}\oplus\mathbf{5}\oplus\mathbf{10}.$$ The vector representation of $SO(5)$ is this $\mathbf{5}$, but it's in the antisymmetric part of this tensor product decomposition: $$\wedge^2\mathbf{4} = \mathbf{1}\oplus\mathbf{5}$$ The $\mathbf{1}$ is there, because of the definition of $USp(4)$.

So, there's no quadratic $Spin(5)$-equivariant map $\mathbf{4}\to\mathbf{5}$.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-20 16:59 (UTC), posted by SE-user Yuji Tachikawa
answered Jul 17, 2011 by (130 points)
Thank you very much Yuji. Could you give me a reference for what $USp(4)$ means and for the isomorphism you began with? -Richard

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-20 16:59 (UTC), posted by SE-user Richard Montgomery
@Richard Montgomery: Sometimes it is useful to denote $Sp(n)$ as $Usp(2n)$, for any integer $n$. The isomorphism between $Spin(5)$ and $Sp(2)$ is reviewed in section 2 of the following paper by Salamon, calvino.polito.it/~salamon/T/tour.pdf.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-20 16:59 (UTC), posted by SE-user Giuseppe Tortorella

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ys$\varnothing$csOverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.