Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,848 answers , 20,603 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Dirac operator in Generalized Geometry

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
207 views

I am wondering how the Dirac operator can be built in the context of Hichin's generalized geometry.

In particular, I have the following questions:

  • On a spin manifold, is the conventional spin connection replaced by a generalized one that has two coordinate indices?

  • If so, does this generalized spin connection behave as a non-Abelian $\text{SO}(3,1)$ "B-field" (called also Kalb-Ramond field in physics)?

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-02-17 11:28 (UTC), posted by SE-user Gian
asked Feb 9, 2015 in Theoretical Physics by Gian (65 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Feb 17, 2015

1 Answer

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

The structure group of $TX \oplus T^*X$ is $SO(n,n)$. Since $w_2(TX) = w_2(T^*X)$, this bundle always admits a spin structure and we lift to $Spin(n,n)$. The sections of the associated spinor bundle are not spinors in the usual way but bispinors like you guessed (they have two spinor indices, one from $TX$ and one from $T^*X$).

A B-field (in the sense of http://arxiv.org/pdf/math/0401221v1 ) determines an extension

$T^*X \to E \to TX$.

By the splitting principle, this bundle also admits a sort of bispinor.

Now it is a bit confusing to me since in physical applications (eg. the wonderful thesis of Yi Li: http://thesis.library.caltech.edu/2098/) only ordinary spinors are used, though I think that the (complex) bispinors are $\psi_+ \otimes \psi_-$ and $\bar\psi_+ \otimes \bar\psi_-$. We have $Spin(n,n) = Spin(n) \times_{\ZZ/2} Spin(n)$ and accordingly the spinor representation splits as a tensor product. A spin structure on $TX$ I think gives a basis of the sections of the bispinor bundle of simple tensors, so we get well-defined $\psi_+$ and $\psi_-$.

answered Feb 20, 2015 by Ryan Thorngren (1,605 points) [ revision history ]
edited Feb 20, 2015 by Ryan Thorngren

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar\varnothing$sicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...