• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

149 submissions , 124 unreviewed
4,015 questions , 1,439 unanswered
4,921 answers , 20,948 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
532 active unimported users
More ...

  Wick rotation and the Riemann zeta function

+ 6 like - 0 dislike

The goal of this question is to conceptualize in some way the fact that the Riemann zeta function $\zeta(s)$, and other zeta functions like it, have analytic continuations.


I have by now convinced myself that the following is a reasonable conceptualization of why the Riemann zeta function for real $s > 1$ is a natural object of study. First, the probability distributions $\mathbb{P}(X = n) = \frac{1}{\zeta(s)} \left( \frac{1}{n^s} \right)$ on $\mathbb{N}$ are the unique ones satisfying the following two conditions:

  • Given that $n | X$, the probability distribution on $\frac{X}{n}$ is the same as the original distribution, and
  • $\mathbb{P}(X = n)$ is monotonically decreasing.

Second, if one looks at the sequence of measures $\mu_s(A) = \sum_{a \in A} \mathbb{P}(X = a)$ of a subset $A \subset \mathbb{N}$ with respect to the above distribution, then the $s \to 1^{+}$ limit is the logarithmic density of $A$, which agrees with the natural density of $A$ if it exists.

One can also use statistical-mechanical language to describe the above distribution. There is a statistical-mechanical system, the Riemann gas, whose states are the positive integers $n$ and whose energies are the numbers $\log n$, and $\zeta(s)$ is its partition function (which then determines a distribution on $\mathbb{N}$ in the usual way). This explanation conceptualizes, among other things, the von Mangoldt function, whose Dirichlet series is just the average energy of the above system.

However, the language of probability distributions is insufficient for talking about $\zeta(s)$ for $s \le 1$ or for complex $s$.


Is there a way to conceptualize the values of the zeta function at complex values of $s$ as a "Wick rotation" of its values at real $s$? That is, is there some reasonable quantum-mechanical interpretation of numbers like the "formal" measure

$$\mu_{s+it}(A) = \frac{1}{\zeta(s+it)} \sum_{a \in A} e^{-(s + it)\log a}$$

(for $s, t$ real) as a probability amplitude, or something along those lines? Does this reasonable quantum-mechanical interpretation single out the critical line $s = \frac{1}{2}$?

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-01-08 14:06 (UTC), posted by SE-user Qiaochu Yuan
asked Nov 14, 2010 in Theoretical Physics by Qiaochu Yuan (380 points) [ no revision ]

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-01-08 14:06 (UTC), posted by SE-user Steve Huntsman
I found a paper that mentions both Wick rotations and zeta functions. I have no idea whether it does what you want. J Casahorran, Quantum-mechanical tunneling: differential operators, zeta-functions and determinants, Fortschr. Phys. 50 (2002), no. 3-4, 405–424, MR 2003k:81061.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-01-08 14:06 (UTC), posted by SE-user Gerry Myerson
Thanks, Gerry. Unfortunately reading the abstract it sounds like the paper is using zeta-function regularization and not directly talking about zeta functions.

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-01-08 14:06 (UTC), posted by SE-user Qiaochu Yuan
The Casahorran paper is available for free on arXiv.org: arxiv.org/pdf/quant-ph/0011059

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-01-08 14:06 (UTC), posted by SE-user mathphysicist

1 Answer

+ 6 like - 0 dislike

The Riemann zeta function $\zeta(s)$ at complex $s$ has the statistical physics interpretation of a partition function at complex temperature. This has no direct physical meaning in general, but for certain models it does. A notable example is the Ising model, where the real and imaginary temperature axes are related by a transformation from an hexagonal to a triangular lattice.

Quite generally, the zeroes of the partition function in the complex plane fall on lines rather than in areas. For ferromagnetic models this is the content of the Yang-Lee theorem. It is therefore natural to expect the Riemann hypothesis to hold, although the Yang-Lee theorem does not cover this case.

An overview of the older literature on complex temperature partition functions is: "Location of zeros in the complex temperature plane: Absence of Lee-Yang theorem", W. van Saarloos and D. A Kurtze, J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 17 (1984) 1301-1311. A more recent paper is "Complex-temperature partition function zeros of the Potts model on the honeycomb and kagome ́ lattices", H. Feldmann, R. Shrock, and S.-H. Tsai, Phys. Rev. E 57, 1335 (1998). There are many more papers, it is a quite active field of study.

A very recent paper is http://arxiv.org/pdf/1110.0942

This post imported from StackExchange MathOverflow at 2015-01-08 14:06 (UTC), posted by SE-user Carlo Beenakker
answered Aug 22, 2011 by Carlo Beenakker (180 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights