Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,851 answers , 20,619 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Fast and slow modes in renormalization group of nonlinear sigma model

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
213 views

A general nonlinear sigma model can be expressed as \begin{equation} S[g] = \frac{1}{\lambda} \int d^dr\ \text{tr}[\triangledown g\triangledown g^{-1}] \end{equation} where $g$ takes value in a matrix representation of some compact Lie group $G$. Usual renormalization group analysis of the model starts with the Callan-Symanzik equation (see e.g. Quantum Field Theory and Critical Phenomena by Zinn-Justin). However, I am wondering how the Wilson's approach works. How to decompose $g$ to a part for fast modes and a part for slow modes? Discussion of the approach can be found in Sec. 8.5 of Condensed Matter Field Theory by Altland and Simons, but I am confused by the statement $g(\mathbf{r})=g_s(\mathbf{r})g_f(\mathbf{r})$. How can we do that? How is a Fourier transform of a matrix-represented compact lie group defined?

A hint is given by A. Polyakov in Chapter 2 of his book Gauge Fields and Strings, where he decomposes $g(\mathbf{r})$ as $h(\mathbf{r})\cdot g_{cl}(\mathbf{r})$ with $g_{cl}(\mathbf{r})$ some classical solution to the Lagrangian. But I cannot get the brief explanation though.

In Altland and Simons, their idea is to write $g = e^{iW}$. $W$ is the Lie algebra. Then the fast and the slow components are referring to $W$. 

Some related unanswered questions on Physics StackExchange can be found here and here.


This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-12-18 12:35 (UTC), posted by SE-user L. Su

asked Dec 18, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by DarKnightS (125 points) [ revision history ]
edited Dec 19, 2014 by DarKnightS
Well, since it's matrix valued, I guess the Fourier transform can be defined entry-wise. "$g(\mathbf{r})=g_s(\mathbf{r})g_f(\mathbf{r})$" also looks weird to me, in general even the dimensions of two sides of this equation are not the same.
The entry-wise Fourier transform does not seem to work here. It will lead to $g(\mathbf{r})=g_s(\mathbf{r})+g_f(\mathbf{r})$, where $g_s$ and $g_f$ may not be in the group. But I am sure that people had tried Wilson's slicing-integreting-rescaling approach. I am waiting to be enlightened.
Given that not everyone has the access to the book, it will be more helpful and promising if you can include more details, like what exactly Altland and Simons were doing in the context.

Sure. I'll expand it later. For those who are interested, in the $O(n)$ nonlinear sigma model, the distinction between ''fast'' and ''slow'' results from different degrees of freedom . See Polyakov's derivation in Interaction of goldstone particles in two dimensions. Applications to ferromagnets and massive Yang-Mills fieldsSee also Chapter 12, &13 in Interacting Electrons and Quantum Magnetism. 

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOver$\varnothing$low
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...