Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

146 submissions , 123 unreviewed
3,961 questions , 1,408 unanswered
4,890 answers , 20,766 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
506 active unimported users
More ...

Spin tensor and Lorentz group operator in bispinor case

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
51 views

For infinisesimal bispinor transformations we have $$ \delta \Psi = \frac{1}{2}\omega^{\mu \nu}\eta_{\mu \nu}\Psi , \quad \delta \bar {\Psi} = -\frac{1}{2}\omega^{\mu \nu}\bar {\Psi}\eta_{\mu \nu}, \quad \eta_{\mu \nu} = -\frac{1}{4}(\gamma_{\mu}\gamma_{\nu} - \gamma_{\nu}\gamma_{\mu}). \qquad (.1) $$ Then, by compairing $(.1)$ with transformation by the generators of the Lorentz group, $$ \delta \Psi = \frac{i}{2}\omega^{\mu \nu}J_{\mu \nu}\Psi , $$ we can make the conclusion that in bispinor representation $$ J_{\mu \nu} = -i\eta_{\mu \nu}. \qquad (.2) $$ By the other way, from Noether theorem we can get spin tensor, $$ S^{\mu, \alpha \beta} = \frac{\partial L}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\Psi)}Y^{\alpha \beta} + \bar {Y}^{\alpha \beta}\frac{\partial L}{\partial (\partial_{\mu}\bar {\Psi})}. $$ Then, by having $(.1)$ and Lagrangian $$ L = \bar {\Psi}(i \gamma^{\mu}\partial_{\mu} - m)\Psi , $$ it's easy to show that $$ S^{\mu, \alpha \beta} = i\bar {\Psi}\gamma^{\mu}\eta^{\alpha \beta}\Psi . $$ It's clearly that I can get $(.2)$ by $$ S^{\alpha \beta} = \int S^{\mu, \alpha \beta}dx_{\mu}, $$ but for me it's not obvious how to compute it. Can you help me?


This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-12-14 11:30 (UTC), posted by SE-user PhysiXxx

asked Oct 13, 2013 in Theoretical Physics by PhysiXxx (45 points) [ revision history ]
edited Dec 14, 2014 by Dilaton

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

By Noether’s theorem, the generators of the Lorentz group are the zero components of the currents, i.e., the Lorentz charges:

$$S^{\alpha\beta} = S^{0,\alpha\beta} = i\bar {\Psi}\gamma^{0}\eta^{\alpha \beta}\Psi = \Psi^{\dagger}\eta^{\alpha \beta}\Psi $$

These charges generate the Lorentz transformations on the spinors by the canonical Poisson brackets:

$$\left \{ \Psi, \Psi^{\dagger} \right \}_{P.B.} = -i \mathbb{I}$$

(With all other Poisson combinations vanishing). The Poisson brackets can be obtained from the time derivative term in the Dirac Lagrangian:

$$i \Psi^{\dagger}\partial_0\Psi $$

Which implies that $i \Psi^{\dagger}$ is the canonical momentum of $\Psi$, thus satisfies the canonical Poisson brackets.

The action of the Lorentz charges correctly generates the Lorentz transformation:

$$\delta \Psi = \left \{ \frac{1}{2} \omega_{\alpha\beta }S^{\alpha\beta}, \Psi^{\dagger} \right \}_{P.B.} = \frac{1}{2}\omega^{\alpha \beta}\eta_{\alpha \beta}\Psi$$

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-12-14 11:30 (UTC), posted by SE-user David Bar Moshe
answered Oct 14, 2013 by David Bar Moshe (3,875 points) [ no revision ]
"...Which implies that $i\Psi^{+}$ is the canonical momentum of $\Psi$, thus satisfies the canonical Poisson brackets...", - did you make this conclusion by the connection $$ L_{d} = \pi \partial_{0}\Psi - H_{d}, $$ where $H$ is given from Dirac equation, $$ i\partial_{0}\Psi = H\Psi , \quad H = (\gamma \cdot \hat {\mathbf p}) + m, \quad H_{d} = \bar {\Psi} H \Psi ? $$

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-12-14 11:30 (UTC), posted by SE-user PhysiXxx
And what physical sense has bracket $$ \delta \Psi = \left[\frac{1}{2}\omega_{\alpha \beta}S^{\alpha \beta}, \Psi^{+}\right]_{P.B.}? $$

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-12-14 11:30 (UTC), posted by SE-user PhysiXxx
Oh yes, I understand. It is generator of infinitesimal transformations through Poisson's brackets.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-12-14 11:30 (UTC), posted by SE-user PhysiXxx
Unfortunately, it generates false infinitesimal transformations for $i\Psi^{+}$.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-12-14 11:30 (UTC), posted by SE-user PhysiXxx
If the problem is a sign problem, please notice that the $\Psi$s are Grassmann variables and they acquire minus signs when they are commuted.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-12-14 11:30 (UTC), posted by SE-user David Bar Moshe
Maybe, it's such worse. The transformations for $i\Psi^{+}$ can be represented as $$ (\delta \Psi )^{+} = \frac{\omega^{\mu \nu}}{2}\Psi^{+}\eta_{\mu \nu}^{+} = \frac{\omega^{\mu \nu}}{2}\Psi^{+}\gamma_{0}\eta_{\mu \nu}\gamma_{0} \qquad (.1)$$ (analogical ways of transforamation's derivation give the same). But then $$[\gamma_{0}, \eta_{\mu \nu}] = \frac{1}{2}(g_{0\nu}\gamma_{\mu} - g_{0\mu}\gamma_{\nu}),$$ and it's convolution with $\omega^{\mu \nu}$ gives $\frac{1}{2}\omega^{\mu 0}\gamma_{\mu}$. So I can't transform $(.1)$ to form which is given by Poisson's brackets.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-12-14 11:30 (UTC), posted by SE-user PhysiXxx

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ys$\varnothing$csOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...