• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,037 questions , 2,191 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,706 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Regge behavior of the 1342 ordering of the Veneziano amplitude

+ 3 like - 0 dislike

I'm trying to understand the Regge limit of the following open string diagram,

\(\frac{\Gamma(-1-\alpha' s)\Gamma(-1-\alpha' u)}{\Gamma(-2-\alpha'(s+u))} \)

The other diagrams I understand fine and lead to the usual Regge behavior, \((1+\exp(-i\pi \alpha' t))(\alpha' s)^{\alpha' t}\)

But this diagram is confusing. We take s to infinity along a direction where the imaginary part of s goes to infinity. If we want to be right above the branch cut then we should go in the direction \(s+i\epsilon s\)

This gives \(\frac{(-\alpha' s)^{-\alpha' s}(-\alpha' u)^{-\alpha' u}}{\Gamma(2+\alpha' t)}\)

The phase of this is \(\exp(i\pi \alpha' s)\)

At this point all the old dual resonance model papers say that this is exponentially suppressed, which I understand because the imaginary part of s is large. But what about when we go back to the physical region, where the imaginary part of s is zero? Then this seems to give a nonvanishing result, which modifies the standard Regge answer. Any ideas on why this is wrong?

asked Aug 18, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by Matthew Dodelson [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights