Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,853 answers , 20,624 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Solving the 3D Ising Model with the Conformal Bootstrap

Originality
+ 5 - 0
Accuracy
+ 3 - 0
Score
8.15
1239 views
Referee this paper: [arXiv:1203.6064]

Please use comments to point to previous work in this direction, and reviews to referee the accuracy of the paper. Feel free to edit this submission to summarise the paper (just click on edit, your summary will then appear under the horizontal line)

(Is this your paper?)


This 2012 paper by S. El-Showk, M.F. Paulos, D. Poland, S. Rychkov, D. Simmons-Duffin and A. Vichi studies the constraints of crossing symmetry and unitarity in general 3D Conformal Field Theories.

''In doing so we derive new results for conformal blocks appearing in four-point functions of scalars and present an efficient method for their computation in arbitrary space-time dimension. Comparing the resulting bounds on operator dimensions and OPE coefficients in 3D to known results, we find that the 3D Ising model lies at a corner point on the boundary of the allowed parameter space. We also derive general upper bounds on the dimensions of higher spin operators, relevant in the context of theories with weakly broken higher spin symmetries.''

summarized by Jia Yiyang , Arnold Neumaier , Dilaton
paper authored Aug 1, 2012 to cond-mat by  (no author on PO assigned yet) 
  • [ revision history ]
    edited Jan 8, 2015 by Dilaton

    Here is a quora answer by David Simons-Duffin on how to read the two papers. 

    1 Review

    + 4 like - 0 dislike

    Summary. This is the first part of a series of two papers on using the conformal bootstrap to determine a variety of critical exponents for 3-dimensional field theories in the Ising universality class to a precision higher than ever before. This shows that the theoretical methods of operator-based quantum field theory are now developed to a very high level.

    The first paper, reviewed below, provides background and formulas needed (and preliminary numerical results) for the numerical investigations described in the second paper, reviewed here.


    Background. A universality class is a class of field theories with a critical point, whose members can be described asymptotically close to the critical point by a common conformal field theory.

    The 3-dimensional Ising universality class is highly important because many realistic thermodynamic systems - among them all real fluids - are believed to belong to this class. (See, e.g., the discussion and references in my paper here.) 

    Although the Ising model (describing classically interacting binary spins on a 3-dimensional lattice) figures in the title, the body of the papers are not concerned with lattices. The title effectively refers to the name of the universality class, believed to also include the continuum limit of the 3-dimensional Ising model at its critical temperature (from which the name of the class derived). 

    No mathematically rigorous universality results in 3 space dimensions are known, but the physical evidence for universality is quite strong. For example, a variety of other methods ($\epsilon$-expansion of continuum field theories, high temperature expansions of lattice models, Monte Carlo studies with different lattices, and fits to experimental critical thermodynamic data of various fluids) were used in the past to approximate critical exponents and other critical data, and in spite of the different origins, the results were found to be consistent with each other. (Other universality classes are needed to model systems with different symmetries or different dimensions.)

    Details. The setting is conformal quantum field theory on the 3-sphere, the 1-point compactification of 3-dimensional Euclidean space. The symmetry group is the Euclidean conformal group $SO(1,4)$ generated by translations, rotations, dilatations and inversions of 3-space. The conformal bootstrap refers to an approach that tries to reconstruct the properties of a conformal field theories from assumptions about the Wightman 4-point functions $\langle \phi_1(x_1)\phi_2(x_2)\phi_3(x_3) \phi_4(x_4)\rangle$ of the fields $\phi_j(x)$ (which may be the same or different).

    The assumptions made are those believed to be valid for the scaling limit of field theories in the Ising universality class, namely:

    • crossing symmetry, which in particular implies that for any scalar primary field $\sigma(x)$, the 4-point functions  \[W(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4):=\langle \sigma(x_1) \sigma(x_2) \sigma(x_3) \sigma(x_4)\rangle\] are invariant under a permutation of the factors;
    • a convergent operator product expansion, whose associativity implies in particular that these 4-point functions can be written (using $x_{ik}:=x_i-x_k$) in terms of so-called conformal blocks $G_{\Delta,j}(u,v)$ as a sum \[W(x_1,x_2,x_3,x_4)=\sum_{\Delta,j} p_{\Delta,j}\frac{G_{\Delta,j}(u,v)}{x_{12}^{2\Delta_\sigma}x_{34}^{2\Delta_\sigma}}, ~~u=\frac{x_{12}^2x_{34}^2}{x_{13}^2x_{24}^2},~v=\frac{x_{14}^2x_{23}^2}{x_{13}^2x_{24}^2}\] over all scaling dimensions $\Delta$ and spins $j$; 
    • reflection positivity, which gives the field theory a Hilbert space structure;
    • minimality of the central charge, the undetermined proportionality factor in the otherwise explictly known 2-point function of the stress tensor. 

    (Those interested in a rigorous background can find related material based on the conformal version of the Wightman axioms in N.M. Nikolov, K.H. Rehren and I.T. Todorov, Partial wave expansion and Wightman positivity in conformal field theory, Nuclear Physics B722 (2005), 266-296. It seems that the techniques there can be profitably combined with those in the present paper.)

    The conformal blocks are explicitly known functions for which numerically efficient formulations are found. Reflection positivity implies that all $p_{\Delta,j}$ are nonnegative and gives restrictions on the possible pairs $(\Delta,j)$; in particular, all scaling dimensions are nonnegative. Crossing symmetry implies that
    \[
    g(u,v)=(u/v)^{\Delta_\sigma}g(v,u).
    \]
    One also has a normalization condition $p_{00}=1$.

    These conditions together imply restrictions on the spectrum of the theory, i.e., the collection of pairs $(\Delta,j)$ that occur in the above sum with a positive coefficient, proving the presence of corresponding operators in the operator content of the theory.

    The numerical techniques to probe this spectrum are tentatively developed in this paper and highly refined in the second paper; they will be discussed in the review there.

    Conclusion. To realize that the Ising universality class is (numerically) characterized by the minimality of the central charge is the main novelty of the approach. That the numerical methods were developed to a point where (in the second paper) the accuracy significantly exceeds that of Monte Carlo lattice studies (the hitherto most accurate technique) makes the technique highly important. 

    reviewed Sep 19, 2014 by Arnold Neumaier (12,355 points) [ revision history ]
    edited Sep 20, 2014 by Arnold Neumaier
    Such a nice review, it makes me wanna print out the paper immediately and learn more about this. And it is also a motivation for finally coming to terms with some CFT issues ...

    Your Review:

    Please use reviews only to (at least partly) review submissions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
    To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
    Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
    This is the review box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
    Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
    Your name to display (optional):
    Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
    Anti-spam verification:
    If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
    p$\hbar$ysi$\varnothing$sOverflow
    Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
    To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




    user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

    Your rights
    ...