• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

174 submissions , 137 unreviewed
4,308 questions , 1,640 unanswered
5,089 answers , 21,602 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
635 active unimported users
More ...

  experimental bounds on spacetime torsion

+ 18 like - 0 dislike

Did Gravity Probe B provide any bounds on Einstein-Cartan torsion? is a non-zero torsion value at odds with the results regarding frame-dragging and geodetic effects?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Oct 8, 2011 in Theoretical Physics by CharlesJQuarra (515 points) [ no revision ]
+1 for question. My own dilettante understanding is that torsion is localised and correspond to angular momentum, i.e. spin. So I guess that unless someone had been making precision measurements of magnets it's hard to observe.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

2 Answers

+ 7 like - 0 dislike

There is a Phys Rev D paper from 2007 ("Constraining torsion with Gravity Probe B", by Mao, Tegmark, Guth and Cabi, gr-qc:0608121) which discusses testing torsion using Gravity Probe B, and provides bounds on some parameters given the preliminary data available at the time. A more recent PhD thesis by one of the authors contains a somewhat updated version, see arXiv:0808.2063. However, there is another paper by Flanagan and Rosenthal (arxiv:07041447) which appears to show that theories of the form discussed in these other papers are only internally consistent for ranges of parameters which do not produce effects detectable by Gravity Probe B.

Looking through the papers citing these papers, there appears to be no updated analysis with respect to bounds on torsion. That said, this is far from my area of expertise, so perhaps someone else can give you an authoritative answer.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Oct 10, 2011 by Joe Fitzsimons (3,575 points) [ no revision ]
+ 5 like - 0 dislike

Like Joe, this isn't my area of expertise, but there are some more recent papers that I know of. Another Phys. Rev. D paper from Feb. 2011 (Constraining spacetime torsion with the Moon and Mercury, arxiv:1101.2789v2) has been on my computer for a couple months, but I haven't looked at it yet. The same authors wrote a July 2011 paper (Constraining spacetime torsion with LAGEOS, arXiv:1101.2791v3), which I know even less about than the previous one. A basic overview of the group's work is available here, and it appears that some more results may be forthcoming. As I haven't read any of the papers seriously, I can't personally speak for their accuracy.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Oct 11, 2011 by Logan Maingi (210 points) [ no revision ]
thanks for the overview link

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

Please log in or register to answer this question.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights