• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Why are string theorists interested in entanglement entropy?

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

I have been reading some papers on Ryu-Takyanagi but I am not seeing a good explanation as to why entanglement entropy of the boundary CFT a good observable to probe the possible bulk quantum gravity.

Is there any sense of non-renormalizability about this observable?
Any kind of deformation invariance? (like Witten index)
Is it even defined for CFTs at finite temperature or at arbitrary coupling?

asked Jun 4, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by curiousgradstudent (65 points) [ no revision ]

Could this Maldacena talk be helpful? 

Yes, I remember that Lumo has mentioned entanglement entropy in one of his ER/EPR TRF posts too. Might be related to the strenght or the ER bridge?

1 Answer

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

Partial answer (only to the first part of your question):

I read through this paper (PDF), and I don't see anything exceptionally surprising about the entanglement entropy being a suitable observable to probe the dual quantum gravity theory. The entanglement entropy \(S\) is equal to \(\frac{A}{4G_N}\), which is of course related to the possible bulk quantum gravity. You can read more on pg 2 of the linked paper (pg 2 of the paper, not of the PDF file).      

answered Jun 8, 2014 by dimension10 (1,985 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights