# Time Reversal, CPT, spin-statistics, mass gap and chirality of Euclidean fermion field theory

+ 4 like - 0 dislike
318 views

In Minkowski space even-dim (say $d+1$ D) spacetime dimension, we can write fermion-field theory as the Lagrangian:

$$\mathcal{L}=\bar{\psi} (i\not \partial-m)\psi+ \bar{\psi} \phi_1 \psi+\bar{\psi} (i \gamma^5)\phi_2 \psi$$

with Yukawa coupling to scalar term (with $\phi_1$) and pseudoscalar term (with $\phi_2$). Here $\bar{\psi}=\psi^\dagger\gamma^0$. This $\mathcal{L}$ is:

(i) Hermitian

(ii) invariant under Lorentz group SO($d,1$).

In the Euclidean fermion field theory, there are many attempts in the literature to find an analytic continuation from Minkowski to Euclidean field theory, and to satisfy the conditions of:

(i) Hermitian

(ii) invariant under rotational group SO($d+1$)

for example, in Steven Weinberg Vol II, $$\mathcal{L}_E= \psi^\dagger(i\not \partial_E-m)\psi$$

or this PRL paper,

$$\mathcal{L}_E= \psi^\dagger i \gamma^E_5(i\not \partial_E-m)\psi$$

in the case of this PRL paper, $\gamma^E_0=i \gamma_5$, $\gamma^E_5=-i \gamma_0$, and $\gamma^E_j=\gamma^E_j$ for $j=1,2,\dots$

The clifford algebra: ${\gamma_\mu,\gamma_\nu}=2(+,-,-,-,\dots)$, then $${\gamma^E_\mu,\gamma^E_\nu}=2(-,-,-,-,\dots)$$ with $x_E=(t_E,x_1,x_2,x_3,\dots)$

I wonder in the Euclidean fermion field theory:

(Q1) Time Reversal and CPT: how does the Time Reversal $T$ work in Euclidean theory, say $T_E$? Is time reversal $T_E$ the same as parity operator $P$ then? Is $T_E$ unitary or anti-unitary? And whether there is CPT theorem still? If partity $P$ and time reversal $T_E$ operators are (almost) the same meaning in Euclidean space, then how CPT theorem in Euclidean field theory version becomes?

(Q2) spin and spin-statistics:

In Minkowski signature, although spin state does not change under parity $P$, but the spin state changes under time reversal $T$ - spin flips direction, (see, for example, Peskin and Schroeder QFT p.68), say in 4D (d+1=4),

$$\xi^s \to (-i \sigma_2)(\xi^s)^* \equiv \xi^{-s}$$

Flip spin twice and measuring the spin eigenvalue by $(\vec{n} \cdot \vec{\sigma})$,

$$(\vec{n} \cdot \vec{\sigma}) \xi^s = s \xi^s \to \\ (\vec{n} \cdot \vec{\sigma}) (-i \sigma_2 )\big((-i \sigma_2 )(\xi^s)^*\big)^* = (\vec{n} \cdot \vec{\sigma}) (\mathbf{(-1)}\xi^s) = s (\mathbf{(-1)}\xi^s)$$

will give the same eigenvalue of $s$, but the statefunction picks up a (-1) sign. This is related to spin-statistics theorem of fermions.

In Euclidean signature, whether there is a defined notion of spin? Does spin state change under parity $P$ and time reversal $T_E$? Is there any kind of spin-statistics theorem in Euclidean signature?

(Q3) pseudoscalar:

In Minkowski, we have a Hermitian pseudoscalar term $\mathcal{L}_{M,pseudo}=\bar{\psi} (i \gamma^5) \psi$,

with:

$$P \mathcal{L}_{M,pseudo} \psi P= -\mathcal{L}_{M,pseudo}$$

$$T \mathcal{L}_{M,pseudo} \psi T= -\mathcal{L}_{M,pseudo}$$

$$C \mathcal{L}_{M,pseudo} C= +\mathcal{L}_{M,pseudo}$$

In Euclidean space, is there a peudoscalar term $\mathcal{L}_{E,pseudo}$ in the version of this Euclidean theory: $\mathcal{L}_E=\psi^\dagger i \gamma^E_5(i\not \partial_E-m)\psi$, such that $\mathcal{L}_{E,pseudo}$ is Hermitian and SO(d+1) rotational invariance, and with

$$P \mathcal{L}_{E,pseudo} \psi P= -\mathcal{L}_{E,pseudo}$$

$$T_E \mathcal{L}_{E,pseudo} \psi T_E= -\mathcal{L}_{E,pseudo}$$

$$C \mathcal{L}_{E,pseudo} C= +\mathcal{L}_{E,pseudo}$$

what is $\mathcal{L}_{E,pseudo}=?$ in the case of 2D (d+1=2) and 4D (d+1=4)?

(Q4) mass gap and chirality:

In Minkowski theory, the mass gap is due to the term:

$$\mathcal{L}_{M,mass}=m \bar{\psi}\psi= m (\psi_L^\dagger \psi_R+\psi_R^\dagger \psi_L)$$

where $\psi_L,\psi_R$ interpreted as massless limit of Left-, Right-handed Weyl spinors.

In Euclidean theory, however, in Steven Weinberg QFT II's theory, the mass term is written as $m \psi^\dagger \psi$, does that mean

$$\mathcal{L}_{E,mass}=m \psi^\dagger \psi=m (\psi_L^\dagger \psi_L+\psi_R^\dagger \psi_R)$$

the mass gap is generated from a forward scattering term( $L\to L, R\to R$)? (This is weird!) Or does the projection $P_L, P_R$ and chirality is defined differently in Euclidean theory? How does this projection $P_L, P_R$ reflect the group structure of

$$SO(4) \simeq SU(2) \times SU(2)/Z_2 \text{ in the case of 4D} (d+1=4)?$$

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-06-04 11:36 (UCT), posted by SE-user Idear
 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOverfl$\varnothing$wThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.