Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,862 answers , 20,637 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
502 active unimported users
More ...

Help Understanding Spectral Method for solving Differential Equations

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
31 views

I've posted a more detailed version of this question here : SE-ComputationalSci

but I'm really struggling with a simpler and related question. Lets say one wants to solve (I made this equation up, right now)

$F''(x) - F'(x) + x^2 F(x) = \lambda F(x)$, and you are given the boundary conditions $F(0)=F(X) =0$. The domain of $x$ is $(0,X)$.

Now, if I want to use a spectral method, where I expand my functions in terms of Chebyshev polynomials. I would want to do something like this:

1) Change the domain, introduce $y = 2(x/X) -1$ then I would do

2) Express $F (x) = \Sigma_0^{\infty} f_i T_i(y)- \frac{1}{2}f_0$ , where $T_i$ are my Chebyshev polynomials.

3) Use the orthogonality of the polynomials to get set of algebraic equations to solve for $F(x)$.

My question is what do I do with the $x^2$ term in my original equation. Do I rewrite that in terms of $y$, or do I define a new function $x^2*F(x) = G(x)$ and then try to work out how the expansion coefficients for $G(x)$ would be related to $f_i$?

I may just be missing the whole idea of the spectral method, in the first place. The goal of understanding this better would be to reproduce the spectral method used in Appendix A of this paper: http://arxiv.org/pdf/gr-qc/0210102.pdf

Thanks for any answers, and help.

This post imported from StackExchange Mathematics at 2014-06-02 20:27 (UCT), posted by SE-user tau1777
asked Sep 1, 2012 in Mathematics by tau1777 (15 points) [ no revision ]

1 Answer

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

I'd go with door #1, i.e. rewrite $x^2$ in terms of $y$, and then in terms of Chebyshev polynomials in $y$:

$$x^2 = \frac{X^2}{4}(y + 1)^2 = \frac{X^2}{4}\biggl[\frac{T_2(y)}{2} + 2T_1(y) + \frac{3}{2}T_0(y)\biggr]$$

When you expand $F(x)$, the term with $x^2$ then becomes

$$x^2 F(x)\to \frac{X^2}{4}\biggl[\frac{T_2(y)}{2} + 2T_1(y) + \frac{3}{2}T_0(y)\biggr]\biggl(\sum_{i=0}^\infty f_i T_i(y) - \frac{1}{2}f_0\biggr)$$

Now the entire term can be written in terms of products of Chebyshev polynomials, and then you can use the identity

$$2T_i(y)T_j(y) = T_{i + j}(y) + T_{\lvert i - j\rvert}(y)$$

(from the paper) to express those products as sums of other Chebyshev polynomials, so the whole term becomes just a sum of Chebyshev polynomials times some numeric coefficients.

This post imported from StackExchange Mathematics at 2014-06-02 20:27 (UCT), posted by SE-user David Z
answered Sep 2, 2012 by David Z (660 points) [ no revision ]
Thanks,this works out pretty nicely. I was worried about taking this approach b/c I did not seeing it working out this well. I will try and let you know what happens.

This post imported from StackExchange Mathematics at 2014-06-02 20:27 (UCT), posted by SE-user tau1777
Quick question; How did get the expansion of (y+1)^2? Trial and error, software?

This post imported from StackExchange Mathematics at 2014-06-02 20:27 (UCT), posted by SE-user tau1777
I just looked up the definition of the first three Chebyshev polynomials and did a little algebra.

This post imported from StackExchange Mathematics at 2014-06-02 20:27 (UCT), posted by SE-user David Z

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOverf$\varnothing$ow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...