//Like does gravity and elecro magnetism... the way we calculate these change in "extreme" //circumstances. Like a lot of the basic laws of physics and how are universe functions require electro //static background radiation from the creation of the universe which has shown to have some... //"waves" in it. So if the basic fabric of space has waves in it and could potential not exist ... before //the big bang... then are these forces not actually things that are constants or are always their but //instead are created things? because space is expanding (space by my definition being 3 //dementional location occupied by elecro static background radiation) then shouldent this mean the //"fundemental laws of nature" don't apply outside of "space". like the bigbang makes particles come //into and out of existence all the time all around us to make existence exist.... so if their was another //big bang would the laws change would the back ground radiation be different or the same? I just //want some opinions based on up to date knollege which mine is obvioulsy not.
Do the fundamental FORCES (not laws) (http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/forces/funfor.html) that govern our universe EVER CHANGE under any circumstances? This research (http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/gravity-waves-cmb-b-mode-polarization) seems to suggest the DENSITY of the universe changes! What does the universe's density mean exactly? Does it mean more localized CMB in a spaller space? or Does it mean a higher quantity of particles created by CMB? If this research is correct then it would prove that even the fundamental forces of physics are temporary.