• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,064 questions , 2,215 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,728 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Approximation of skeleton diagrams

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

I'm studying the diagrammatics for a Bose system (in the superfluid phase) developed by Gavoret and Nozieres (Annals of Physics 28 349 (1964)).

In this paper, they show how to solve the problem using skeleton diagrams. In other words, they give equations for the two-point, three-point and four-point functions, involving the full Green's functions and irreducible diagrams (that they don't discuss, but I think they mean 2-PI irreducible here). In particular, they discuss in great length how these different functions are linked together, and what kind of Ward identities they have to fulfill in order to respect conservation laws.

Of course, this approach is useless unless one does approximations in order to compute correlation functions. What I don't get is how to approximate this skeleton diagrams in a consistent way to recover (for example) standard perturbation theory, which in this context is Bogoliubov theory, and at the same time be sure that the conservation laws are consistently recovered.

I can't find a nice reference that would tell me how to start from these diagrams and what I should do to them. All the textbooks I've looked at only have few pages on skeleton diagrams, and just show how to express the self energies and vertices with them, without discussing anything more.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-16 05:28 (UCT), posted by SE-user Adam
asked Apr 15, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by Adam (115 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights