Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,852 answers , 20,624 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
501 active unimported users
More ...

Whis is the difference between charge fractionalization in 1D and 2D?

+ 6 like - 0 dislike
64 views

Both 1D Polyacetelene and 2D fractional quantum Hall state can support fractional excitations.

But as I can see, there are some differences: the ground state of Polyacetelene breaks translational invariance but FQHE does not. In general a symmetry breaking state in 2D are considered as conventional state and does not support fractional excitations.

I wonder why is there such a difference between 1D and 2D fractionalizations?
Is there any 1D model can support fractional excitations from a symmetry preserved ground state ?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 04:41 (UCT), posted by SE-user user23765
asked Apr 29, 2013 in Theoretical Physics by user23765 (50 points) [ no revision ]

3 Answers

+ 6 like - 0 dislike

The notion of fractional charge is not well defined in 1D Luttinger liquid (despite many papers say that the charge is fractionalized in 1D Luttinger liquid). In fact, it is hard to define fractional charge in any gapless state if the low energy excitations are not described by free quasiparticles.

For gapped states, fractional charge in 1D is due to translation symmetry breaking, or due to projective representation of the symmetry group (symmetry protected topological phase), while fractional charge in 2D and higher is due to topological order (ie long-range entanglement). See A physical understanding of fractionalization and Why is fractional statistics and non-Abelian common for fractional charges?

For example, topological insulators have no topological order (ie have only short-range entanglement). As a result, topological insulators have no quasiparticles with fractional charges. On the other hand, FQH states have non-trivial topological orders (ie long-range entanglement). As a result, FQH states have both fractional charges and fractional statistics.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 04:41 (UCT), posted by SE-user Xiao-Gang Wen
answered May 1, 2013 by Xiao-Gang Wen (3,319 points) [ no revision ]
Does long-range entanglement mean long-range interaction such as Coulomb interaction? The short-range entanglement in topological insulators means the nearest-neighboring hopping?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 04:41 (UCT), posted by SE-user Jeremy
No. Here we only consider systems with short range interactions and short range hopping. Even with short range interactions and short range hopping, the ground state can be long-range entangled. Long-range entanglement is a new concept, which was defined in arxiv.org/abs/1004.3835 . See also arxiv.org/abs/1210.1281 ,

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 04:41 (UCT), posted by SE-user Xiao-Gang Wen
+ 3 like - 0 dislike

Is there any 1D model can support fractional excitations from a symmetry preserved ground state ?

Yes, in 1D there exist symmetry preserved groud states supporting fractional charge(at the boundary or domain wall). The S=1 SO(3) symmetric Haldane phase is an example, since the edge state carry spin-1/2 and is fractionalized. More examples can be found below: http://arxiv.org/abs/1204.0520 http://arxiv.org/abs/1209.2990

Generally, 1D gapped phases supporting fractional charge of the symmetry group are call symmetry protected topological (SPT) phases, which are classified by projective representatoin of the symmetry group (See Chen, Gu, Wen, Phys. Rev. B 83, 035107 (2011)).

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 04:41 (UCT), posted by SE-user Zheng-Xin Liu
answered Aug 22, 2013 by Zheng-Xin Liu (30 points) [ no revision ]
+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Fractional excitations are understood to be generic in 1D. An example with a "symmetry presreved" state (whatever that is supposed to mean in 1D) is the simple Luttinger liquid. The Luttinger liquid exhibits charge-fractionalization in to spin charge separation. This was first shown here, I believe.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 04:41 (UCT), posted by SE-user BebopButUnsteady
answered Apr 30, 2013 by BebopButUnsteady (325 points) [ no revision ]
Thanks for answering. Since Luttinger liquid is a gapless let me rephrase my question: Is there any gapped 1D model can support fractional excitations from a symmetry preserved ground state ?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 04:41 (UCT), posted by SE-user user23765
(Anti)holons in the Hubbard model are fractional excitations that are gapped, with the gap being of the order of the on-site repulsion $U$.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-05 04:41 (UCT), posted by SE-user delete000

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$y$\varnothing$icsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...