# what is meant by "crossover phenomena"?

+ 3 like - 0 dislike
136 views

In many articles I read the term "crossover phenomena" and a lot of methodology discussed according to it, with little or no description about what is meant by it. Sometimes there is a connection to networks, matrices, and then to other structures of elements. Can someone describe the concept of the phenomena?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-01 16:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user Vass
retagged Apr 1, 2014
I've heard this, or similar terminology, in a broad array of sciences. Can you be more specific about what context you are talking about?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-01 16:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user Colin K
Do You read that in physics articles? I know it from nearly any field of science and arts. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crossover

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-01 16:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user Georg

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

"Crossover" is a general term describing a situation when a system can go from being in one phase to being in another phase as a certain parameter is changed.

The best example of a "crossover" phenomenon I can think of is the BEC-BCS crossover which occurs in cold Fermi gases. There one can tune the scattering length $a$ for pairwise interactions to go from being positive to negative. For $a < 0$ bound states can form and we get a BCS state (Bardeen-Cooper-Schrieffer) due to formation of Cooper pairs. As $a$ is tuned to go from being negative to positive the system "crosses over" from being a BCS to a BEC (Bose-Einstein Condensate).

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-01 16:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user user346
answered Apr 19, 2011 by (1,985 points)
I've also heard it used in the context of anything that ahs any conceptual similarity to cross-correlation. In the sense that if you correlate two signals, each of which have a double-peak shape, you will get a large central peak, and two "cross-over" peaks on either side in your correlation output. I've seen it used this way to describe absorption lines in saturated absorption spectroscopy as well.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-01 16:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user Colin K
+ 2 like - 1 dislike

It is fashionable jargon, suitable for Humpty-Dumpty:

When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less.

Gluzman and Yukalov describe it as being like a function in an interval where, although the behaviour of the function is qualitatively different in the vicinity of the different boundaries of the interval, the function is continuous and there is no identifiable phase transition point.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-04-01 16:42 (UCT), posted by SE-user Henry
answered Apr 19, 2011 by (115 points)

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.