• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,064 questions , 2,215 unanswered
5,347 answers , 22,734 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
818 active unimported users
More ...

  Decomposition of representations of the Virasoro algebra under $sl(2)$

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

The Virasoro algebra has a finite $sl(2)$ sub-algebra generated by $L_{-1}$, $L_0$ and $L_{+1}$. Let's consider a unitary highest weight representation of the Virasoro algebra with conformal weight $h>0$ and central charge $c>1$. How does this representation decompose under the $sl(2)$ sub-algebra?

It is clear that there is an invariant $sl(2)$ sub-module of weight $h$ consisting of the highest weight state $|h\rangle$ and the descendants $L_{-1}|h\rangle$, $L_{-1}L_{-1}|h\rangle$, $\dots$ However, there are many other descendants, such as $L_{-2}|h\rangle$, $L_{-3}|h\rangle$, etc. What $sl(2)$ modules will these states sit in? In particular, is the full $sl(2)$ representation completely reducible, so that it can be written as a sum of irreducible $sl(2)$ representations? Can anything general be said about the multiplicity of the $sl(2)$ representations appearing in the decomposition?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-31 10:14 (UCT), posted by SE-user Olof
asked Aug 7, 2013 in Mathematics by Olof (210 points) [ no revision ]
Maybe this question belongs on math.SE, but there are hardly any questions about the Virasoro algebra at that site, while physics.SE has a whole bunch, so I think there is a bigger chance of getting an answer here.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-31 10:14 (UCT), posted by SE-user Olof
Nah, I'd say the question should stay here, as these issues are of huge interest in theoretical physics, +1 BTW :-)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-31 10:14 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton
I did not understand a word of this reference, but the title seems to be related to your question...

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-31 10:14 (UCT), posted by SE-user Trimok
@Trimok: Thanks for the reference. I agree that it looks a bit dense but useful.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-31 10:14 (UCT), posted by SE-user Olof

1 Answer

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

This is indeed an interesting question. Define a quasi-primary state to be one that is annihilated by $L_1$ i.e., it is a highest-weight vector (state) of the $sl(2)$ subalgebra of the Virasoro algebra. Consider a generic Virasoro highest weight vector, $|h\rangle$, of weight $h$. The Verma module is constructed by acting on $|h\rangle$ by all combinations $L_{-n}$ for $n=1,2,3,\ldots$. By generic I mean none of the descendants are also highest weight vectors (aka null vectors). This is done for simplicity. It follows that the Verma module is irreducible.

Now we wish to decompose this Verma module into irreps of $sl(2)$. The first quasi-primary appears at level $0$ is $|h\rangle$ and its descendants are $L_{-1}^n|h\rangle$ for $n\geq1$. There is no quasi-primary at level 1. At level 2, there is $L_{-2}|h\rangle$ in addition to $(L_1)^2|h\rangle$. But it is not quasi-primary. But a simple calculation shows that $|\phi\rangle:=\left(L_{-2}-\tfrac32 (L_{-1})^2\right)|h\rangle$ is a quasi-primary. This along with its descendants $(L_{-1})^n |\phi\rangle$ is the second irrep of $sl(2)$. One can continue in this fashion at each level and look for quasi-primaries i.e., states annihilated by $L_1$. The statement in the reference mentioned by Trimok, if I understood it correctly, states that at level $(n+1)$, there are descendants that appear by the action of $L_{-1}$ on states at level $n$ and the remaining are necessarily quasi-primaries.

Recall that at level $n$, there are $p(n)$ states where $p(n)$ is the number of partitions of $n$. So it follows that there must be $(p(n+1)-p(n))$ quasi-primaries at level (n+1). I suspect that the proof is not too hard but I have not worked it out. Each quasi-primary is the highest weight vector for an infinite dimensional irrep of sl(2).

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-31 10:14 (UCT), posted by SE-user suresh
answered Jan 10, 2014 by suresh (1,545 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights