If one wants to become a theoretical physicist working on the interface of quantum field theory and statistical mechanics, but he is not into particle physics, not much about superconductor, superfluid etc. What area or question would you suggest him to look into?

Site Statistics

204 submissions , 162 unreviewed

5,026 questions , 2,180 unanswered

5,344 answers , 22,683 comments

1,470 users with positive rep

815 active unimported users

If one wants to become a theoretical physicist working on the interface of quantum field theory and statistical mechanics, but he is not into particle physics, not much about superconductor, superfluid etc. What area or question would you suggest him to look into?

1379 views

asked Aug 12, 2019 in Recommendations by anonymous [ no revision ]

If you don't mind gravity, I would say the SYK model is a pretty good avenue, I believe there are still middle-hanging fruits in this area.

commented Aug 13, 2019 by Jia Yiyang (2,640 points) [ revision history ]
edited Aug 13, 2019 by Jia Yiyang

Your comment on this question:

To answer, leave an answer instead. Comments are usually for non-answers.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
To alert a user, please use the "@" command and remove spaces from the username, example, the user "John Doe" should be pinged as "@JohnDoe", while the user "Johndoe" should be pinged as "@Johndoe". The post author is always automatically pinged (unless you are the post author).
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.

Live preview (may slow down editor) Preview

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if a comment is added after mine:

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Anti-spam verification:

[captcha placeholder]

To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.

Live preview (may slow down editor) Preview

Your name to display (optional):

Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on:

Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.

Anti-spam verification:

If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\varnothing$ysicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).

To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

News

Tools for paper authors

Tools for SE users

Public \(\beta\) tools

Most popular tags

Site Statistics

If one wants to become a theoretical physicist working on the interface of quantum field theory and statistical mechanics, but he is not into particle physics, not much about superconductor, superfluid etc. What area or question would you suggest him to look into?

Your comment on this question:

Live Preview

Preview

Your answer

Live Preview

Preview

News

Tools for paper authors

Tools for SE users

Public \(\beta\) tools

Most popular tags

Related questions

Site Statistics

If one wants to become a theoretical physicist working on the interface of quantum field theory and statistical mechanics, but he is not into particle physics, not much about superconductor, superfluid etc. What area or question would you suggest him to look into?

Your comment on this question:

Live Preview

Preview

Your answer

Live Preview

Preview