• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

145 submissions , 122 unreviewed
3,930 questions , 1,398 unanswered
4,873 answers , 20,701 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
502 active unimported users
More ...

Confinement and fractional charge of quarks from braid group approach to holographic principle

+ 0 - 0
+ 0 - 0
Referee this paper: arXiv:1704.06560 by Janusz E. Jacak

Please use comments to point to previous work in this direction, and reviews to referee the accuracy of the paper. Feel free to edit this submission to summarise the paper (just click on edit, your summary will then appear under the horizontal line)

(Is this your paper?)

requested Jun 17 by Dilaton (4295 points)
submission not yet summarized

paper authored Apr 17 to physics by  (no author on PO assigned yet) 
  • [ no revision ]

    1 Review

    + 2 like - 0 dislike

    This paper proposes that baryons are holographically equivalent to anyons on a 2-sphere. I see basically two propositions here. One is that there is a duality between the description of quarks as fermions with fractional electric charge, and another description in which they are anyons with integer charge. The other is that confinement is the manifestation in the bulk, of a kind of exclusion principle for the boundary anyons whereby they can only be added or removed in groups of integer charge.

    There is no model presented, the words "QCD" and "color" appear nowhere in the paper, nor is there any discussion of mesons, gluons, deconfinement... The genesis of the paper is probably just with the thought that the fractional charges of quarks are like the fractionalized charges of quantum Hall anyons - I had that thought too (and so surely did many people), I just never combined it with holography.

    One might be tempted to dismiss the paper as a superficial speculation. However, a few things give me pause. There is a history of speculation about integer charges for quarks, starting with the Han-Nambu charge assignment (which does not match experiment). If one studies anomaly cancellation in the standard model plus gravity, there are two hypercharge assignments which work: one is the standard model as we know it, the other is a so-called "bizarre" assignment in which the quarks have integer hypercharge. S.A. Abbas has recently claimed that the bizarre hypercharges actually correspond to a valid dual description of nuclear physics.

    Meanwhile, there is now a body of work in mainstream AdS/CFT, studying bulk duals of anyonic systems, in which the anyons are obtained by a kind of electric-magnetic duality transformation on a conventional CFT. And just today (!), Gorsky et al have suggested that such a transformation maps to a new isotopic/baryonic duality of QCD.

    So for me the bottom line is that, although this is a "what if" paper that doesn't engage much with the actual details of either hadronic physics or holography, the bare idea that baryons may, under certain circumstances, have an anyonic dual, is not easily refuted. The final verdict on that hypothesis awaits the outcome of these more sophisticated and rigorous investigations.

    reviewed Jun 20 by Mitchell Porter (1,245 points) [ no revision ]

    Thanks for this nice and interesting to read review!

    Your Review:

    Please use reviews only to (at least partly) review submissions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
    To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
    Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
    This is the review box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
    Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
    Your name to display (optional):
    Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
    Anti-spam verification:
    If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
    Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
    To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

    user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

    Your rights