Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

146 submissions , 123 unreviewed
3,961 questions , 1,408 unanswered
4,890 answers , 20,766 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
506 active unimported users
More ...

For the gapped phase of Kitaev model, where does the first excited state reside in, the zero-flux sector or not?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
208 views

As we know, there are both gapless and gapped ground states of the Kitaev model, and let's fix the couplings $J_x,J_y,J_z$ such that the model being in the gapped phase. My question is, does the first excited state reside in the zero-flux sector?

Consider the ground state energy $E(F)$ for a given flux configuration $F$, it is known that the zero-flux configuration $F_0$ minimizes the ground state energy $E(F_0)$. Now let $E(F_1)$ be the second minimal ground state energy corresponding to some flux configuration $F_1$, and define $\Delta_1=E(F_1)-E(F_0)$. And let $\Delta_0$ represent the energy gap of the quadratic fermionic Hamiltonian in the zero-flux configuration $F_0$.

Now there are some possibilities: If $\Delta_0<\Delta_1$, then the first excited state of the whole system would still correspond to $F_0$; if $\Delta_1<\Delta_0$, then the first excited state would run into $F_1$. The energy gap $\Delta$ of the whole system should take $\Delta=min(\Delta_0,\Delta_1)$. But the original paper seems not mentioning this point. Does anybody know some related articles? Thank you very much.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-05-24 19:08 (UCT), posted by SE-user K-boy
asked May 24, 2014 in Theoretical Physics by Kai Li (975 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar\varnothing$sicsOverflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...