Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

New features!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

123 submissions , 104 unreviewed
3,547 questions , 1,198 unanswered
4,552 answers , 19,366 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
411 active unimported users
More ...

AdS/CFT seminal papers?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
144 views

I am about to begin my PhD in the applications of duality and holographic techniques to open problems in condensed matter physics. An area often called AdS/CMT. Having seen some relevant reviews, I realize that it is easy to find some nice descriptions and discussions concerning how holography is used to tackle such issues, i.e. holographic superconductors etc. However, in most such reviews the origin of the correspondence is only at best motivated, lacking any detailed discussion. I would like to ask your opinion about which two or three seminal papers regarding AdS/CFT should I focus on, in order to gain a deeper understanding on how the original correspondence was formulated on the first place. Brief remarks together with your suggestions are more than welcome.


This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-05 14:39 (UCT), posted by SE-user Cala

asked Sep 25, 2013 in Resources and References by Cala (0 points) [ revision history ]
recategorized Apr 24, 2014 by dimension10
Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/36303/2451 , physics.stackexchange.com/q/61647/2451 and links therein.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-05 14:39 (UCT), posted by SE-user Qmechanic
Also see the answer by Genneth to this question: physics.stackexchange.com/q/8162

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-05 14:39 (UCT), posted by SE-user user10001

2 Answers

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

The following paper currently has almost 7500 citations. Why does it have so many? Because it is amazing; read it.

Anti de Sitter Space and Holography, by Edward Witten

The canonical, detailed review is the following paper which currently has nearly 4000 citations (pretty weak...I know).

Large N Field Theories, String Theory and Gravity, by MAGOO

Everyone I know who works in AdS/CFT has read Witten's paper above more than once, and at least once with pen and paper in hand to redo his computations. The paper by MAGOO is the go-to reference in the field.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-05 14:39 (UCT), posted by SE-user joshphysics
answered Sep 25, 2013 by joshphysics (810 points) [ no revision ]
+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Concerning applications of holography, you should perhaps first read Andreas Karch's fresh introduction here:

http://motls.blogspot.com/2013/09/guest-blog-on-applications-of-holography.html?m=1

which also links to papers and proceedings that map the landscape of the papers, too. Josh is of course right that those are some of the key papers of AdS/CFT itself but you may have specifically wanted applications outside high-energy physics.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-05 14:39 (UCT), posted by SE-user Luboš Motl
answered Sep 25, 2013 by Luboš Motl (10,178 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOver$\varnothing$low
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...