• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

198 submissions , 156 unreviewed
4,910 questions , 2,085 unanswered
5,318 answers , 22,540 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
808 active unimported users
More ...

Wall for Ron Maimon

Are you still participating here?
Dec 19, 2014 by physicsnewbie
@WolfinSheepSkin: I couldn't do that, I'd forget most of them. I could do "most important papers to me in the last few days", but it's a vanity project, best to look at what is interesting to you, given your interest.
Nov 17, 2014 by Ron Maimon
Hey Ron, why don't you make a list of the most important (to you) published papers?
Nov 17, 2014 by WolfInSheepSkin
Is it possible for admins such as yourself to delete and modify the comments of other users?
Nov 8, 2014 by physicsnewbie
Thanks Ron,

yes I was annoyed about these comments and thought such things should not be let sitting on PO too, so I agree with hard-deleting them.

Dimension10 also hid the ridiculous answer there, and I ensured that your comment which contains useful requests to clarify the question is still there (I linked to it on SE). Not sure if you want to edit it because the bad answer is now gone ...

BTW thanks for the recent bunch of immensely nice posts, in particular the answer to this question


Linking to PO answers of imported questions quite often helps in making the OP register here ... :-)
Oct 3, 2014 by Dilaton
I don't know, nothing happened from PO's side, maybe it was just a bug on his side.
Sep 17, 2014 by dimension10
Hi Ron, when creating a submission, please give the submitter a link to the submission.
Sep 16, 2014 by dimension10
Glad to hear that. Does it mean that it was accepted for review? Where can I now find it?
Sep 16, 2014 by
The deleted comments were not physics comments at all - you didn't even read them, so I appreciate if you don't defend something that you haven't even read.
Sep 9, 2014 by dimension10
Yes, they have deleted some of my comments, but it is nothing.
I do not want to get involved in your discussion, but you discuss my personality and this becomes available for anyone. So I am just defending me by saying what I am for and what I am against.
It is a good idea of yours not to create a getto for me and for the like.
Concerning Euclidean analogs, it can be discussed, but for the moment it is not convincing to me. There is no my intuition about particle radiation. There is a clear mistake. The radiation field carries away energy momentum and it is the radiation field who should be involved in the energy balance, not the near field (self-induction). Nobody of you wants to discuss this mistake. But maybe I am wrong.

I wrote a sarcastic review because I have lost any hope to discuss the matter professionally. Everything turns into discussing my personality (my knowledge, my (dis)honesty, etc.). We could have resolved my mistake, if any, long ago.
Sep 8, 2014 by

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights