Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Is there any relationship between Gravity and Electromagnetism?

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
1506 views

We all know that the universe is governed by four Fundamental Forces which are The strong force , The weak force , The electromagnetic force and The gravitational force .

Now, is there any relationship between Electromagnetism and gravity?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 03:25 (UCT), posted by SE-user Hossam Mohamed
asked Sep 3, 2013 in Theoretical Physics by Hossam Mohamed (10 points) [ no revision ]
Possible duplicates: physics.stackexchange.com/q/944/2451 and links therein.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 03:25 (UCT), posted by SE-user Qmechanic
ncatlab.org/nlab/show/Kaluza-Klein+mechanism

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 03:25 (UCT), posted by SE-user Urs Schreiber
I have no formal physics training, but it seems to me that they are intrinsically connected. If gravity effects mass and mass & energy (electromagnetic waves or light) are related through Einsteins equation, then gravity and light possess a very clear relationship. It seems logical to me, but can someone more qualified chime in?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 03:25 (UCT), posted by SE-user user29224
@UrsSchreiber: Oh my god, that's an Excellent article!

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 03:25 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dimensio1n0
@DImension10, thanks for the feedback. I just went through that entry again and expanded a bit more here and there. For instance the Examples-section now has a new subsection "Cascades of KK-reductions from holographic boundaries" ncatlab.org/nlab/show/… .

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 03:25 (UCT), posted by SE-user Urs Schreiber
@DImension10AbhimanyuPS: Concerning retagging, I would say that the QED tag is not appropriate here, since the relationship between GR and EM is mainly at the classical level.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 03:25 (UCT), posted by SE-user Qmechanic
@Qmechanic: I added it in, because the U(1) bundle thing is relevant to QED. However, feel free to remove it, of course.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-24 03:25 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dimensio1n0

1 Answer

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

On Unification

I presume you're asking whether just classical gravity & classical EM can be unified.

They sure can!

Classical General Relativity and Classical Electromagnetism are unified in Kaluza-Klein-Theory, which proves that 5-dimensional general relativity is equivalent to 4-dimensional general relativity plus 4-dimensional maxwell equations. Rather interesting, isn't it? A byproduct is the scalar "Radion" or "Dilaton" which appears due to the "55" component of the metric tensor. In other words, the Kaluza-Klein metric tensor equals the GR metric tensor with maxwell stuff on the right and at the bottom; BUT you have an extra field down there.

$${g_{\mu \nu }} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{g_{11}}}&{{g_{12}}}&{{g_{13}}}&{{g_{14}}}&{{g_{15}}} \\ {{g_{21}}}&{{g_{22}}}&{{g_{23}}}&{{g_{24}}}&{{g_{25}}} \\ {{g_{31}}}&{{g_{32}}}&{{g_{33}}}&{{g_{34}}}&{{g_{35}}} \\ {{g_{41}}}&{{g_{42}}}&{{g_{43}}}&{{g_{44}}}&{{g_{45}}} \\ {{g_{51}}}&{{g_{52}}}&{{g_{53}}}&{{g_{54}}}&{{g_{55}}} \end{array}} \right]$$

Imagine 2 imaginary lines now.

$${g_{\mu \nu }} = \left[ {\begin{array}{*{20}{cccc|c}} {{g_{11}}}&{{g_{12}}}&{{g_{13}}}&{{g_{14}}} & {{g_{15}}} \\ {{g_{21}}}&{{g_{22}}}&{{g_{23}}}&{{g_{24}}} & {{g_{25}}} \\ {{g_{31}}}&{{g_{32}}}&{{g_{33}}}&{{g_{34}}} & {{g_{35}}} \\ {{g_{41}}}&{{g_{42}}}&{{g_{43}}}&{{g_{44}}} & {{g_{45}}} \\ \hline {{g_{51}}}&{{g_{52}}}&{{g_{53}}}&{{g_{54}}} & {{g_{55}}} \end{array}} \right]$$

So the stuff on the top-left is the GR metric for gravity, and the stuff on the edge ($g_{j5}$ and $g_{5j}$) is for electromagnetism and you have an additional component on the bottom right. This is the radion/dilaton.

An extension to kaluza - klein is , which also talks about the weak and strong forces, and requires .

On Geometry

In , the gauge group for is $U(1)$.

Now, the key thing here is that Electromagnetism is then The Curvature of the $U(1)$ bundle.

This is not the only geometric connection between General Relativity and Quantum Field Theory. In the same context, the covariant derivatives is general relativity are such that $\nabla_\mu-\partial_\mu$ sort-of measures the gravity, in a certain way, while this is also true in QFT, where to some constants, $\nabla_\mu-\partial_\mu=ig_sA_\mu$.

It is to be noted that both are in similiar context.

answered Sep 3, 2013 by dimension10 (1,985 points) [ revision history ]
edited Jan 31, 2015 by dimension10

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOve$\varnothing$flow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...