# Spacelike slicing of Schwarzschild geometry

+ 1 like - 0 dislike
1000 views

I am having trouble understanding how to obtain a spacelike slicing of the Schwarchild black hole. I understand there is not a globally well defined timelike killing vector, so we can define t=cte slices outside the horizon and r=cte slices inside the horizon.

In the literature people define connector slices that join these two spacelike surfaces.

What is the formal definition of a spacelike connector slice? What is the most practical way to go about finding its mathematical expression?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-22 16:57 (UCT), posted by SE-user Super Frog
Is there a reason you're not using Kruskal coordinates? In those coordinates there is no horizon singularity, and the "radial" coordinate stays spacelike everywhere.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-22 16:57 (UCT), posted by SE-user Michael Brown
@MichaelBrown Thanks for the answer. I assume once I have my slice in Kruskal coordinates I can go back to any other coordinate system and I will see how the connector looks like?

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-22 16:57 (UCT), posted by SE-user Super Frog
I'm not exactly sure what a "connector" is - but yes, you can certainly go to any other coordinate system from Kruskal. If there is a coordinate singularity at the horizon in the new coordinate system then the coordinate transformation will have a singularity that you need to be careful about, but there is no reason in principle that it shouldn't work.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-22 16:57 (UCT), posted by SE-user Michael Brown

When defining a foliation by spacelike slices given by a function $t$=const, there is no need to require $\frac{\partial}{\partial t}$ to be a Killing vector. For example you can foliate a Schwarzschild spacetime by using $t$=const slices in the Painleve Gullstrand form of the metric $$ds^2 = -(1-\frac{2M}{r})dt^2 + 2\sqrt{\frac{2M}{r}}dtdr + dr^2+r^2d\Omega^2$$ Or, as Michael Brown said in the comment, Kruskal coordinates is another choice. Both these choices are nonsingular across the horizon.
 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysics$\varnothing$verflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). Please complete the anti-spam verification