# Derivative of quantities with internal indices

+ 2 like - 0 dislike
61 views

In the context of the 3 + 1 decomposition of spacetime needed for a Hamiltionian formulation of general relativity, quantities with so called internal indices are introduced (in the book I am reading on p.43). For such quatities $G^i$ , some kind of a "covariant derivative" is defined:

$D_aG^i = \partial_a G^i + \Gamma _{aj}^iG^i$

Using this derivative, a corresponding "curvature tensor" $\Omega_{ab}^{ji}$ is then calculated by

$D_aD_b - D_bD_a = \Omega_{ab}^{ji}G^i$

1) Why is $\Gamma _{aj}^i$ called spin connection; it has to do with the spin of what ...?

2) How is the so called curvature of connection $\Omega_{ab}^{ji}$ related to the "conventional" curvature tensor ?

Which book are you using? (and by any chance does this have to do with the spin networks of loop quantum gravity?)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:27 (UCT), posted by SE-user David Z
Ha ha @DavidZaslavsky, Im reading this childrens book :-P and they introduce the notation and concepts Im asking about around p.43.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:27 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton
... the link in my above comment does not work as I expected it; You have to scroll down to the bottom of the article to see why it is a childrens book :-)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:27 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton

+ 5 like - 0 dislike

1) The spin connection allows you to define covariant derivatives of spinors in curved spacetime. For example, to do this, you want a set of gamma matrices which are covariantly constant, so you use the combinations

$\Gamma^i=\gamma^a E_a^i$

where $\gamma^a$ are the usual flat space gamma matrices and $E_a^i$ are the tetrad components, i.e.

$E_a=E_a^i\partial_i$

where $E_a$ is the tetrad basis for the tangent space.

2) The differential geometric relations between the vielbein formalism and the "standard" one is described in detail here. Section IV B describes the curvature relationship I think you're looking for.

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:27 (UCT), posted by SE-user twistor59
answered Mar 11, 2012 by (2,500 points)
Thanks @twistor59 this is very helpful; and the whole paper looks interesting. Although I`ll probably have to brush up my knowledge about the tetrade formalism (from my relativity demystified book) a bit first to fully understand it ... :-)

This post imported from StackExchange Physics at 2014-03-17 03:27 (UCT), posted by SE-user Dilaton

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ysicsOverflo$\varnothing$Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.