• Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.


New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback


(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

185 submissions , 145 unreviewed
4,725 questions , 1,928 unanswered
5,268 answers , 22,442 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
743 active unimported users
More ...

  What papers should everyone read?

+ 20 like - 0 dislike

Mathoverflow A single paper everyone should read?

CSTheory What papers should everyone read?


What papers should every physicist read?


  • One paper per answer.
  • Please provide at least a sentence what is inside and why you consider it so worth reading.
  • Choose original papers of important basic results rather than large survey papers or "meta" paper suggestion by Gil Kalai

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

asked Nov 24, 2011 in Resources and References by Pratik Deoghare (30 points) [ revision history ]
recategorized Jan 23, 2015 by Jia Yiyang
Patrik, it is a nice soft question but consider providing the full description in the question (as there is in MO and CSTheory) as _What papers should everyone read?_ without further description is a bit vague IMHO.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Just one publication per answer? Okay, I suppose I get to spam a few answers then.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

15 Answers

+ 1 like - 0 dislike

Chapter 1, volume 3 of the Feynman lectures. It is simply put, the most important article I ever read in my life.

It is required reading not just for physicists, but really any human that wants to learn about the universe.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Nov 29, 2011 by Columbia (160 points) [ no revision ]
+ 1 like - 0 dislike

First a gloss to the way I understand the question : "should everyone read" - I mean that every serious researcher (in theoretical physics) has to refer as to an ultimate resource in searching for truth in natural sciences.

I am aware the fact, that many clever adepts in theoretical physics ignore the following milestones, nevertheless If they hadn't, the landscape of modern (theoretical) physics would have been much more optimistic.

  • Astronomia nova - Johannes Kepler (1609)
  • Philosophiæ Naturalis Principia Mathematica - Isaac Newton (1687)
  • Über die Hypothesen welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen - Bernhard Riemann (1854)

These papers/books are indispensable, since no one has mentioned them yet and for their incomparable impact on sciences, more words are worthless.

To mention a modern review paper with many interesting references therein I could add :

PDE as a Unified Subject by Sergiu Klainerman.

An essay on partial differential equations written by a leading expert in the field, I strongly recommend to anyone attemping to know more on the subject as well as to those who would like to get a grasp of interactions between Mathematics and Physics.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Dec 29, 2011 by Artes (0 points) [ no revision ]
+ 2 like - 2 dislike

Anyone starting in physics has probably already purchased this book at their university bookstore, but I recomend it:

Griffiths, David (1987). Introduction to elementary particles (New ed.). New York: Wiley. ISBN 0471603864.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Nov 25, 2011 by Larian LeQuella (110 points) [ no revision ]
Is there anything Griffiths didn't write? I'm particularly fond of my Intro to QM of his. The old fashioned hardback one with the gold cat on the front and back. Excellent introductory text. Intro to EM is also excellent.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
Griffiths' books are excellent, but I don't think this answer is particularly on topic in this thread.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
+ 0 like - 0 dislike

Thank you for the information. I was just searching for the information on maths as well as physics for my assignments. I am finding it tough to prepare. I also went through the essay review services to find a suitable website for my assignment help. Here I could find many useful information regarding the maths and physics subjects. Hoping to get more information.

answered Jan 23, 2015 by lynnsonya (0 points) [ no revision ]
+ 0 like - 1 dislike

Theodor Kaluza Theory of 1919.

"The unifying feature of this theory was that it unified Einstein's theory of gravitation and Maxwell's electromagnetic theory.

As Kaku writes

... this unknown scientist was proposing to combine, in one stroke, the two greatest field theories known to science, Maxwell's and Einstein's, by mixing them in the fifth dimension."

I fly all the way to Berlin, just for a copy. LOOPS '05

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Dec 8, 2011 by Terry Giblin (-60 points) [ no revision ]

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
To avoid this verification in future, please log in or register.

user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights