# examples of heterotic CFTs

+ 9 like - 0 dislike
416 views

I'm trying to get a global idea of the world of conformal field theories.

Many authors restrict attention to CFTs where the algerbas of left and right movers agree. I'd like to increase my intuition for the cases where that fails (i.e. heterotic CFTs).

What are the simplest models of heterotic CFTs?

There exist beautiful classification results (due to Fuchs-Runkel-Schweigert) in the non-heterotic case that say that rational CFTs with a prescribed chiral algebras are classified by Morita equivlence classes of Frobenius algebras (a.k.a. Q-systems) in the corresponding modular category.

Is anything similar available in the heterotic case?

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
asked Nov 21, 2011
I guess you are aware of the article http://arxiv.org/abs/math-ph/0009004 where Prof. Rehren includes the heterotic case from the beginning....

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
That's a nice paper... I was more looking for actual examples of heterotic CFTs: ones that are particularly easy to describe, or that are specially relevant for other purposes.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)

+ 4 like - 0 dislike

The first example that comes to mind is the heterotic string worldsheet theory, described in the original paper of Gross, Harvey, Martinec, & Rohm.

I don't know if there is a classification result for rational heterotic CFTs which generalizes the FRS result. However, if you want to understand the global space of CFTs, you may not want to emphasize rational CFTs anyways. Most CFTs aren't rational.

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Nov 22, 2011 by (415 points)
Thanks for your answer. I'm now reading this article. If I understand, there's 2 CFTs constructed: one compactified on the $E_8\times E_8$-torus, and one compactified on the $\Gamma_{16}$-torus. Quote: "In order to achieve a consistent string theory involving only left-moving coordinates $X^I$ to cancel anomalies and to preserve the geometrical structure of string interactions, we are forced to compactify on a special torus". Do I understand that, as far as constructing CFTs is concerned, I may disregard those constraints and compactify on any torus? (or not compactify at all)

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
+ 0 like - 0 dislike

I just found by incidence a simple example in some proceedings of Böckenhauer and Evans below. Namely for $\mathrm{Spin}(8\ell)_1$ (so $D_{4\ell}$ lattice) with $\ell=1,2,\ldots$ there exist modular invariants, which should give rise to heterotic models (by Rehrens paper).

This post has been migrated from (A51.SE)
answered Nov 23, 2011 by (300 points)

 Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead. To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL. Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post. This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button. Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview Your name to display (optional): Email me at this address if my answer is selected or commented on: Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications. Anti-spam verification: If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:p$\hbar$ys$\varnothing$csOverflowThen drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds). Please complete the anti-spam verification