Quantcast
  • Register
PhysicsOverflow is a next-generation academic platform for physicists and astronomers, including a community peer review system and a postgraduate-level discussion forum analogous to MathOverflow.

Welcome to PhysicsOverflow! PhysicsOverflow is an open platform for community peer review and graduate-level Physics discussion.

Please help promote PhysicsOverflow ads elsewhere if you like it.

News

PO is now at the Physics Department of Bielefeld University!

New printer friendly PO pages!

Migration to Bielefeld University was successful!

Please vote for this year's PhysicsOverflow ads!

Please do help out in categorising submissions. Submit a paper to PhysicsOverflow!

... see more

Tools for paper authors

Submit paper
Claim Paper Authorship

Tools for SE users

Search User
Reclaim SE Account
Request Account Merger
Nativise imported posts
Claim post (deleted users)
Import SE post

Users whose questions have been imported from Physics Stack Exchange, Theoretical Physics Stack Exchange, or any other Stack Exchange site are kindly requested to reclaim their account and not to register as a new user.

Public \(\beta\) tools

Report a bug with a feature
Request a new functionality
404 page design
Send feedback

Attributions

(propose a free ad)

Site Statistics

205 submissions , 163 unreviewed
5,047 questions , 2,200 unanswered
5,345 answers , 22,709 comments
1,470 users with positive rep
816 active unimported users
More ...

  Site Design

+ 5 like - 0 dislike
7859 views

We should make our site look more "Physics-ish" than it currently looks. This is achieved not only by changing the logo, but changing many other images, and etc. 

Not only should we make the site more physics-ish, but also concentrate on the usability and user-friendliness aspect of the site.  

So use this thread to suggest improvements to the design of the site.           

asked Feb 23, 2014 in Feature Request by dimension10 (1,985 points) [ no revision ]
retagged Feb 26, 2014 by dimension10

21 Answers

+ 1 like - 1 dislike

Can our vote buttons look like creation and annhilation operators? 

Replace qa-theme/Snow/images/vote-buttons.png with 

SVG (install the "Euclid" font first): http://img3.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20140223062610/psiepsilon-test/images/2/28/Votes.svg  

answered Feb 23, 2014 by dimension10 (1,985 points) [ no revision ]

This is not a good idea, because the operators are not as visually clear as the arrows. It would be more clear to use up-down arrows as the notation for the creation and annihilation operators than to do this.

I agree with that. I will try and come up with something that is both maths/physics-ish and looks user-friendly enough.               

+ 0 like - 0 dislike
answered Feb 23, 2014 by dimension10 (1,985 points) [ revision history ]
edited Mar 2, 2014 by dimension10
+ 0 like - 0 dislike

[DONE and changed]  

Please change the background-colour of the navigation options when we hover on them. 

The current colour change and cursor pointer change (buh) is not enough. I recommend we use the following CSS:           

ul.qa-nav-main-list li.qa-nav-main-item a:hover {background-color:#808080;}  
answered Mar 1, 2014 by dimension10 (1,985 points) [ revision history ]
edited Mar 11, 2014 by dimension10
+ 0 like - 0 dislike

[NOPE] 

What's the point of the Attributions link at the top right?

I don't understand why anyone would want to click on it, and so should be moved elsewhere. Likewise, the text about regaining an account should be put on the registration page. News: should be moved to the top of the box, to make clear what this bit of blue background is for.

Edit: The Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Generic license requires attributing work to authors or licensor in a specified manner.

When I first saw the attributions link, I didn't realize it was in fact a legal statement, and instead saw it as a pointless explanation of how questions and answers were imported from TP.SE. I therefore think the text should be changed from attributions to 

Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Generic license: Attribution

This way, people logging on for the first time can see that it's some sort of legal blurb. I also think it should be put on the bottom of the text box, separate from everything else.

answered Mar 1, 2014 by physicsnewbie (-20 points) [ revision history ]
edited Mar 21, 2014 by physicsnewbie
Most voted comments show all comments

The boring attribution link is needed to prevent our "friends" from jumping into our face colloquielly speaking ... The importance of people who already have an account on the site because their questions are imported, first trying to regain their accound as we have presently no possibility to merge accounts, justifies offering this facility directly on the front page I think.
 

@physicsnewbie Read Dilaton's comment above. PSE data is licensed under CC-by-SA, we have' to attribute them. I don't know if the text at the end of the imported posts is legally enough, but this link helps keep them happy.            

@dimension10 But please do not remove the name in the attribution lines of imported questions.

@polarkernel I know that of course, I meant mentions in comments, questions, and answers. 

@dilaton, assuming it was you who moved it, the attributions link looks much better at the bottom away from the more important stuff on top. But I still think you need the following text: Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Generic license: Attribution

This can be either replace the current attributions text at the bottom of the box on the main page, or it could be the title of the page it links to. First time round, it's difficult for a new user to understand the point of the attributions link.

Most recent comments show all comments

That reminds me, just before we go public, we should do a site-wide search for "Stack Exchange" and hide all the posts with these words, except the FAQ, which can be made to sound nicer, ; "Stack Exchange" would have to be an exception to "Be Frank". 

@physicsnewbie I moved it after seeing your suggestion here, but since the attributions link is for attributions to SE, and not attributions required by us, the new link title you propose is somewhat ambiguous. 

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

[DONE]  

Should we change the way the NavBar options are highlighted? 

I know I had earlier suggested that the NavBar options are highlighted when hovered on, so that it is clearer when an option is being selected. This was implemented, but I think it has turned out to be quite ugly. 

I don't want to give up on the idea of having a better visual effect upon hovering on options in the navigation bar, however, this is not the way, I now realise.  

A better idea would maybe be to underline the options when hovering on them.    

Also, I don't like the animation of the navigation bars slowly changing colour upon hover, it doesn't look good, and is troublesome when you want to quickly navigate through the site.        

answered Mar 5, 2014 by dimension10 (1,985 points) [ revision history ]
edited Mar 16, 2014 by dimension10

On the third row of the navigation bar, the options light up in a way that looks neat - especially the red "hot" option. It's a little disappointing the stuff above doesn't highlight in the same way, rather than as just a blue underline. I find this to be very effective on the math and stack overflow sites that highlight theirs in orange/yellow.

There was a period during which we did that; it didn't look professional at all, not for big options. 

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

[DONE]

Can we remove the "hello" and the avatar from the top bar? I'm sure everyone would agree that it is extremely distracting.   

answered Mar 11, 2014 by dimension10 (1,985 points) [ no revision ]
+ 0 like - 0 dislike

[DONE] 

Those "shadow"s should be removed. Here's the site without those shadows.     

answered Mar 15, 2014 by dimension10 (1,985 points) [ revision history ]
edited Mar 17, 2014 by dimension10

Shadow has gone.

@polarkernel Thanks.   

+ 0 like - 0 dislike

[DONE] 

Can the titles on the question page of a question have the same size as on the the title of the questions in the question lists?

To me, it seems they are too small now ...

On Physics SE and MathOverflow the titles on the question pages are not that small either.
 

answered Mar 27, 2014 by Dilaton (6,240 points) [ revision history ]
edited Mar 28, 2014 by dimension10

Sorry! I thought this would make the site look more professional. I have removed the CSS now.  

+ 1 like - 1 dislike

Can we remove the unnecessary grey border?

I don't see why we can't copy Maths stack exchange in making as much of the screen as white as possible. It should also help to sharpen up the logo quite a bit by increasing the contrast.

answered Mar 28, 2014 by physicsnewbie (-20 points) [ revision history ]
edited Apr 18, 2014 by Arnold Neumaier

You mean grey background, right? 

I have tried this before, but it doesn't look good, it looks eye-hurting (even when the screen brightness is 1). 

But thanks for bringing this up, though.   

+ 0 like - 1 dislike

Can we have an option in our profile for setting up email alerts?

I was thinkinging of something on the lines of:

  • enable
    • immediately
    • daily
    • weekly
    • monthly
answered Mar 30, 2014 by physicsnewbie (-20 points) [ revision history ]
edited Mar 30, 2014 by physicsnewbie

I guess you are talking about the email me unticking, which isn't "design".  

Your answer

Please use answers only to (at least partly) answer questions. To comment, discuss, or ask for clarification, leave a comment instead.
To mask links under text, please type your text, highlight it, and click the "link" button. You can then enter your link URL.
Please consult the FAQ for as to how to format your post.
This is the answer box; if you want to write a comment instead, please use the 'add comment' button.
Live preview (may slow down editor)   Preview
Your name to display (optional):
Privacy: Your email address will only be used for sending these notifications.
Anti-spam verification:
If you are a human please identify the position of the character covered by the symbol $\varnothing$ in the following word:
p$\hbar$ysicsOv$\varnothing$rflow
Then drag the red bullet below over the corresponding character of our banner. When you drop it there, the bullet changes to green (on slow internet connections after a few seconds).
Please complete the anti-spam verification




user contributions licensed under cc by-sa 3.0 with attribution required

Your rights
...